The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thermodynamic Stability of Carbonic Anhydrase: Measurements of Binding Affinity and Stoichiometry Using ThermoFluor
Abstract
ThermoFluor (a miniaturized high-throughput protein stability assay) was used to analyze the linkage between protein thermal stability and ligand binding. Equilibrium binding ligands increase protein thermal stability by an amount proportional to the concentration and affinity of the ligand. Binding constants (K(b)) were measured by examining the systematic effect of ligand concentration on protein stability. The precise ligand effects depend on the thermodynamics of protein stability: in particular, the unfolding enthalpy. An extension of current theoretical treatments was developed for tight binding inhibitors, where ligand effect on T(m) can also reveal binding stoichiometry. A thermodynamic analysis of carbonic anhydrase by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) enabled a dissection of the Gibbs free energy of stability into enthalpic and entropic components. Under certain conditions, thermal stability increased by over 30 degrees C; the heat capacity of protein unfolding was estimated from the dependence of calorimetric enthalpy on T(m). The binding affinity of six sulfonamide inhibitors to two isozymes (human type 1 and bovine type 2) was analyzed by both ThermoFluor and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), resulting in a good correlation in the rank ordering of ligand affinity. This combined investigation by ThermoFluor, ITC, and DSC provides a detailed picture of the linkage between ligand binding and protein stability. The systematic effect of ligands on stability is shown to be a general tool to measure affinity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structure and mechanism of carbonic anhydrase
Lindskog, S. (1997) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(96)00198-2 · Cited by 1,022
Cited by
Monitoring Drug Target Engagement in Cells and Tissues Using the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay
Molina, D. M., Jafari, R., Ignatushchenko, M., Seki, T., Larsson, E. A., Dan, C., Sreekumar, L., Cao, Y., & Nordlund, P. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1233606 · Cited by 2,261
Rabeh, W. M., Bossard, F., Xu, H., Okiyoneda, T., Bagdany, M., Mulvihill, C. M., Du, K., di Bernardo, S., Liu, Y., Konermann, L., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.024 · Cited by 280
PCSK9 binds to multiple receptors and can be functionally inhibited by an EGF-A peptide
Shan, L., Pang, L., Zhang, R., Murgolo, N. J., Lan, H., & Hedrick, J. A. (2008) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.106 · Cited by 180
ROR nuclear receptors: Structures, related diseases, and drug discovery
Zhang, Y., Luo, X.-Y., Wu, D.-H., & Xu, Y. (2015) · Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · doi:10.1038/aps.2014.120 · Cited by 151
Jackson, T. W., Scheibly, C. M., Polera, M. E., & Belcher, S. M. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c01200 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Matulis, D., Kranz, J. K., Salemme, F. R., & Todd, M. J.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-03-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5258-5266
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2145275398
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermodynamic Stability of Carbonic Anhydrase: Measurements of Binding Affinity and Stoichiometry Using ThermoFluor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi048135v
- The paper
- Matulis, D., Kranz, J. K., Salemme, F. R., & Todd, M. J. (2005). Thermodynamic Stability of Carbonic Anhydrase: Measurements of Binding Affinity and Stoichiometry Using ThermoFluor. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi048135v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.