The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repair of Cisplatin−DNA Adducts by the Mammalian Excision Nuclease
Abstract
Nucleotide excision repair is one of the many cellular defense mechanisms against the toxic effects of cisplatin. An in vitro excision repair assay employing mammalian cell-free extracts was used to determine that the 1,2-d(ApG) intrastrand cross-link, a prevalent cisplatin-DNA adduct, is excised by the excinuclease from a site-specifically modified oligonucleotide 156 base pairs in length. Repair of the minor interstrand d(G)/d(G) cross-link was not detected by using this system. Proteins containing the high mobility group (HMG) domain DNA-binding motif, in particular, rat HMG1 and a murine testis-specific HMG-domain protein, specifically inhibit excision repair of the intrastrand 1,2-d(GpG) and -d(ApG) cross-links. This effect was also exhibited by a single HMG domain from HMG1. Similar inhibition of repair of a site-specific 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link by an HMG-domain protein also occurred in a reconstituted system containing highly purified repair factors. These results indicate that HMG-domain proteins can block excision repair of the major cisplatin-DNA adducts and suggest that such an activity could contribute to the unique sensitivity of certain tumors to the drug. The reconstituted excinuclease was more efficient at excising the 1,3-d(GpTpG) intrastrand adduct than either the 1,2-d(GpG) or d(ApG) intrastrand adducts, in agreement with previous experiments using whole cell extracts [Huang, J. -C., Zamble, D. B., Reardon, J. T., Lippard, S. J., Sancar, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 10394-10398]. This result suggests that structural differences among the platinated DNA substrates, and not the presence of unidentified cellular factors, determine the relative excision repair rates of cisplatin-DNA intrastrand cross-links in the whole cell extracts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular processing of platinum anticancer drugs
Wang, D., & Lippard, S. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1691 · Cited by 3,801
Self-citationMechanisms of resistance to cisplatin
Kartalou, M., & Essigmann, J. M. (2001) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00141-5 · Cited by 869
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair
Gillet, L. C. J., & Schärer, O. D. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040483f · Cited by 642
Cisplatin: From DNA damage to cancer chemotherapy
Cohen, S. M., & Lippard, S. J. (2001) · Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(01)67026-0 · Cited by 615
Self-citationFormation and Repair of Interstrand Cross-Links in DNA
Noll, D. M., Mason, T. M., & Miller, P. S. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040478b · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamble, D. B., Mu, D., Reardon, J. T., Sancar, A., & Lippard, S. J.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 10004-10013
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2080883315
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repair of Cisplatin−DNA Adducts by the Mammalian Excision Nuclease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi960453+
- The paper
- Zamble, D. B., Mu, D., Reardon, J. T., Sancar, A., & Lippard, S. J. (1996). Repair of Cisplatin−DNA Adducts by the Mammalian Excision Nuclease. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi960453%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.