Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Crystal Structure of Citrate Synthase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus at 1.9 Å Resolution,

Russell, Rupert J. M., Ferguson, Jacqueline M. C., Hough, David W., Danson, Michael J., Taylor, Garry L.·1997·Biochemistry
DOI 10.1021/bi9705321
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The crystal structure of the closed form of citrate synthase, with citrate and CoA bound, from the hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus has been determined to 1.9 A. This has allowed direct structural comparisons between the same enzyme from organisms growing optimally at 37 degrees C (pig), 55 degrees C (Thermoplasma acidophilum) and now 100 degrees C (Pyrococcus furiosus). The three enzymes are homodimers and share a similar overall fold, with the dimer interface comprising primarily an eight alpha-helical sandwich of four antiparallel pairs of helices. The active sites show similar modes of substrate binding; moreover, the structural equivalence of the amino acid residues implicated in catalysis implies that the mechanism proceeds via the same acid-base catalytic process. Given the overall structural and mechanistic similarities, it has been possible to make detailed structural comparisons between the three citrate synthases, and a number of differences can be identified in passing from the mesophilic to thermophilic to hyperthermophilic citrate synthases. The most significant of these are an increased compactness of the enzyme, a more intimate association of the subunits, an increase in intersubunit ion pairs, and a reduction in thermolabile residues. Compactness is achieved by the shortening of a number of loops, an increase in the number of atoms buried from solvent, an optimized packing of side chains in the interior, and an absence of cavities. The intimate subunit association in the dimeric P. furiosus enzyme is achieved by greater complementarity of the monomers and by the C-terminal region of each monomer folding over the surface of the other monomer, in contrast to the pig enzyme where the C-terminus has a very different fold. The increased number of intersubunit ion pairs is accompanied by an increase in the number involved in networks. Interestingly, all loop regions in the P. furiosus enzyme either are shorter or contain additional ion pairs compared with the pig enzyme. The possible relevance of these structural features to enzyme hyperthermostability is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi9705321

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Russell, R. J. M., Ferguson, J. M. C., Hough, D. W., Danson, M. J., & Taylor, G. L.
Venue
Biochemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
36
Issue
33
Pages
9983-9994
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
DOI
10.1021/bi9705321
OpenAlex
W1973892074
Cited by
275
References
20
FWCI
13.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.