The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Activating Dual Phosphorylation of MAPK by MEK Is Nonprocessive
Abstract
Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), also known as extracellular-signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), by MAPK/extracellular protein kinase kinases (MEKs) requires phosphorylation at two sites. The first step in MAPK activation by MEK must be the formation of a MEK x MAPK enzyme-substrate complex, followed by phosphorylation producing monophosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK). Subsequently, one of two events may occur. (1) MEK catalyzes the second and fully activating phosphorylation of MAPK, producing ppMAPK (a processive mechanism). (2) The complex of MEK x pMAPK dissociates before the second phosphorylation occurs, full activation requiring a reassociation of pMAPK with MEK (a nonprocessive or distributive mechanism). Simulations indicate that these two mechanisms predict different kinetics of MAPK activation. Specifically, the nonprocessive mechanism predicts that there will be a paradoxical decrease in the rate of MAPK activation as the MAPK concentration is increased. The present study uses p42 MAPK, also known as ERK2, and MEK1 as representatives of their respective classes of enzymes. We find that increasing the ERK2 concentration decreases the rate of activation by a mechanism which does not involve inhibition of MEK1 function. The accumulation of the active, doubly phosphorylated ERK2 (ppERK2) was directly assessed using a phosphorylation-state-specific antibody. The rate of accumulation of ppERK2 is decreased by increasing the ERK2 concentration. Therefore, the mechanism of ERK2 activation by MEK1 in vitro is nonprocessive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade.
Huang, C. Y., & Ferrell, J. E. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.19.10078 · Cited by 1,186
Bardwell, L., Cook, J. G., Chang, E. C., Cairns, B. R., & Thorner, J. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.7.3637 · Cited by 161
Cited by
ERK1/2 MAP kinases: Structure, function, and regulation
Roskoski, R. (2012) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,650
Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors
Kolch, W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1743 · Cited by 1,070
Sheu, Y.-J., & Stillman, B. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.033 · Cited by 340
Targeting ERK1/2 protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers
Roskoski, R. (2019) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.039 · Cited by 308
Multisite protein phosphorylation – from molecular mechanisms to kinetic models
Salazar, C., & Höfer, T. (2009) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07027.x · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Burack, W. R., & Sturgill, T. W.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5929-5933
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2011762975
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.