The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ionization−Reactivity Relationships for Cysteine Thiols in Polypeptides
Abstract
Thiol-disulfide exchange reactions are required for many aspects of cellular metabolism including the folding of disulfide-bonded proteins, electron transfer, and numerous regulatory mechanisms. To identify factors influencing the rates of these reactions in polypeptides, the reactivities of Cys thiols in 16 model peptides were measured. For each of the peptides, which contained single Cys residues with thiol pKas ranging from 7.4 to 9.1, the rates of exchange with four disulfide-bonded compounds were measured. In reactions with two of the disulfide reagents, cystine and 2-hydroxyethyl disulfide, the peptide thiols displayed Bronsted correlations between reaction rate and pKa similar to those observed previously with model compounds (betanuc = 0.5 and 0.3, respectively). For two reagents with net charges, oxidized glutathione and cystamine, however, the apparent Bronsted coefficients were 0 and 0.8, respectively. These observations are in striking contrast with those obtained with model compounds, for which the Bronsted coefficients for the nucleophilic thiolates are largely independent of the disulfide-containing compound. The differences in the apparent Bronsted coefficients can be largely accounted for by electrostatic interactions between charged groups on the peptides and disulfide reagents and demonstrate that such interactions can play a dominant role in determining the rates of thiol-disulfide exchange in biological molecules. The results presented here provide an improved basis for predicting the rates of these reactions and suggest ways in which differences in the rates of competing reactions can be either minimized, to simplify the analysis of disulfide-coupled folding reactions, or enhanced, to favor formation of particular disulfides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes
Weerapana, E., Wang, C., Simon, G. M., Richter, F., Khare, S., Dillon, M. B. D., Bachovchin, D. A., Mowen, K., Baker, D., & Cravatt, B. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09472 · Cited by 1,684
Native Chemical Ligation and Extended Methods: Mechanisms, Catalysis, Scope, and Limitations
Agouridas, V., El Mahdi, O., Diemer, V., Cargoët, M., Monbaliu, J.-C. M., & Melnyk, O. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00712 · Cited by 650
pK values of the ionizable groups of proteins
Thurlkill, R. L., Grimsley, G. R., Scholtz, J. M., & Pace, C. N. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.051840806 · Cited by 369
A Perspective on the Kinetics of Covalent and Irreversible Inhibition
Strelow, J. M. (2017) · SLAS Discovery · doi:10.1177/1087057116671509 · Cited by 392
Kuljanin, M., Mitchell, D. C., Schweppe, D. K., Gikandi, A. S., Nusinow, D. P., Bulloch, N. J., Vinogradova, E. V., Wilson, D. L., Kool, E. T., Mancias, J. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-00778-3 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulaj, G., Kortemme, T., & Goldenberg, D. P.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 8965-8972
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2073841855
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionization−Reactivity Relationships for Cysteine Thiols in Polypeptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bi973101r
- The paper
- Bulaj, G., Kortemme, T., & Goldenberg, D. P. (1998). Ionization−Reactivity Relationships for Cysteine Thiols in Polypeptides. Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi973101r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.