Cited by 17Water Treatment and DisinfectionFire effects on ecosystemsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Prescribed Fire Alters Dissolved Organic Matter and Disinfection By-Product Precursors in Forested Watersheds - Part I. A Controlled Laboratory Study

Majidzadeh, Hamed, Wang, Jun-Jian, Chow, Alex T.·2015·ACS Symposium Series

Abstract

Detritus material in forested watersheds is the major terrestrial source of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and disinfection by-product (DBP) precursors in source waters. Forest fire reduces the thickness of detritus layer and changes foliar litters into pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM) on the forest floor, resulting in different quantity and quality of DOM exported from forested watersheds. Many studies have examined DBP precursors exported from forested watersheds; however, DOM leaching from PyOM, or dissolved black carbon (BC), could have different reactivity in DBP formation compared to the DOM leaching from unburned detritus layer. Using controlled laboratory burning in this study, characteristics of foliar litters before and after burn were compared. Quality and quantity of water extractable organic matter (WEOM) from raw and burned foliar litters commonly found in the southeastern United States, including baldcypress ( Taxodium distichum ), boxelder ( Acer negundo ), longleaf pine ( Pinus palustris ), pop ash ( Fraxinus caroliniana ), sweetgum ( Liquidambar styraciflua ), and water tupelo ( Nyssa aquatica ) was compared, and evaluated for their disinfection by-product yield and specific DBP formation using a uniform formation condition test. Laboratory analysis using pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry showed that foliar litters after burn contain significantly less lignins, nitrogenous compounds, and polysaccharides because of loss of organic matter. However, both the formula numbers and relative abundance of PAHs increased, which can be a potential health concern. Water extractable organic carbon (WEOC) and total nitrogen (WETN) decreased after burn and in particular raw material had less humic acid and fulvic acid-like compounds. PyOM aromaticity may be either enhanced or lowered by prescribed fire and highly depending upon the plant species. The specific formation of chloroform (a prevalent DBP species) decreased by 12%-60% for all plant species after burn. However, dissolved BC was more reactive in the formation of nitrogenous disinfection by-products (N-DBPs), and the specific haloacetonitriles formation increased after burn for all species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bk-2015-1190.ch015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each experimental study found both elevated carbon- and nitrogen-based DBPs.

    “Each experimental study found both elevated carbon- and nitrogen-based DBPs.”
  • DBP formation potential from wildfire-generated DON/DOC has been found in several other experimental studies as well, including increased HAA/HAN/THM formation potential from source water collected below other fires in Colorado and exposed to chlorine; dissolved black carbon extracted from burnt leaves of several species in South Carolina; and water extracted organic matter taken from California

    “DBP formation potential from wildfire-generated DON/DOC has been found in several other experimental studies as well, including increased HAA/HAN/THM formation potential from source water collected below other fires in Colorado and exposed to chlorine; dissolved black carbon extracted from burnt leaves of several species in South Carolina; and water extracted organic matter taken from California”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Majidzadeh, H., Wang, J.-J., & Chow, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • School of Forestry and Wildlife Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849
Corresponding author
Chow, Alex T.
Venue
ACS Symposium Series
Published
2015-01
Pages
271-292
ISSN
  • 0097-6156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-5918
OpenAlex
W2491279511
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS symposium series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
prescribed burning, dissolved organic matter, disinfection by-product precursors, pyrogenic organic matter, dissolved black carbon, forested watersheds, leaf litter, water-extractable organic matter, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chloroform formation, haloacetonitriles, nitrogenous disinfection by-products, aromaticity, Taxodium distichum, longleaf pine, water tupelo, Acer negundo, sweetgum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review