Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cell Interactions with Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Films

Richert, L., Lavalle, Ph., Vautier, D., Senger, B., Stoltz, J.-F., Schaaf, P., Voegel, J.-C., Picart, C.·2002·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

The short-term interactions of chondrosarcoma cells with polyelectrolyte multilayer films built up by the alternate adsorption of poly(L-lysine) (PLL) and poly(L-glutamic acid) (PGA) was studied in the presence and in the absence of serum. The films and their interaction with serum proteins were first characterized by means of optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy, quartz crystal microbalance, and zeta potential measurements. In a serum-containing medium, the detachment forces measured by the micropipet technique were about eight times smaller on PGA-ending than on PLL-ending films. For these latter ones, the adhesion force decreased when the film thickness increased. In a serum-free medium, the differences between the negative- and positive-ending films were enhanced: adhesion forces on PLL-ending films were 40-100% higher, whereas no cellular adherence was found on PGA-terminating films. PGA-ending films were found to prevent the adsorption of serum proteins, whereas important protein adsorption was always observed on PLL-ending films. These results show how cell interactions with polyelectrolyte films can be tuned by the type of the outermost layer, the presence of proteins, and the number of layers in the film.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm0255490

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Richert, L., Lavalle, P., Vautier, D., Senger, B., Stoltz, J.-F., Schaaf, P., Voegel, J.-C., & Picart, C.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2002-09-06
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
1170-1178
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2138248527
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
15.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.