Cited by 148Polymer crystallization and propertiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesMaterial Dynamics and Properties

Physical Properties, Crystallization, and Spherulite Growth of Linear and 3-Arm Poly(l-lactide)s

Tsuji, Hideto, Miyase, Tatsuhiro, Tezuka, Yasufumi, Saha, Swapan Kumar·2005·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

The physical properties, crystallization, and spherulite growth behavior and mechanism of linear and 3-arm poly(L-lactide) [i.e., poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA)] have been investigated using absolute molecular weight as a molecular index. The branching reduces the chain mobility of PLLA and must be excluded from the crystalline regions. The former factor gives the higher glass transition temperature (T(g)) and starting temperature for thermal degradation (T(d,S)) of 3-arm PLLA compared with those of linear PLLA. On the other hand, both the former and the latter factors lead to the higher cold crystallization temperature (T(cc)), the longer induction period for spherulite growth (t(i)), the lower melting temperature (T(m)), crystallinitiy (X(c)), and radius growth rate of the spherulties (G) for the 3-arm PLLA compared with those for the linear PLLA. The G of 3-arm PLLA showed the vague dependence on number-average molecular weight (M(n)), probably because the branching effect was balanced with the molecular weight effect. At the M(n) exceeding critical values, the linear and 3-arm PLLA crystallize in regime II or regime III kinetics, depending on crystallization temperature (T(c)). In contrast, at the M(n) below critical values, the linear and 3-arm PLLA crystallize according solely to regime III and regime II kinetics, respectively, for all the T(c).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm049552q

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsuji, H., Miyase, T., Tezuka, Y., & Saha, S. K.
Affiliations
Toyohashi University of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Tsuji, Hideto
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2004-12-14
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
244-254
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W1990403850
Cited by
148
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
Keywords
poly(L-lactic acid), branched polymers, crystallization kinetics, spherulite growth, chain mobility, glass transition temperature, cold crystallization, molecular weight effects, branching effects, crystallinity, melting point, thermal degradation
MeSH terms
Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Crystallization, Polyesters, Temperature, Thermogravimetry, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review