The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling Rigidity and Degradation of Alginate Hydrogels via Molecular Weight Distribution
Abstract
The mechanical rigidity and degradation rate of hydrogels utilized as cell transplantation vehicles have been regarded as critical factors in new tissue formation. However, conventional approaches to accelerate the degradation rate of gels deteriorate their function as a mechanical support in parallel. We hypothesized that adjusting the molecular weight distribution of polymers that are hydrolytically labile but capable of forming gels would allow one to alter the degradation rate of the gels over a broad range, while limiting the range of their elastic moduli (E). We investigated this hypothesis with binary alginate hydrogels formed from both ionically and covalently cross-linked partially oxidized (1% uronic acid residues), low [molecular weight (MW) approximately 60,000 g/mol] and high MW alginates (MW approximately 120,000 g/mol) in order to examine the utility of this approach with various cross-linking strategies. Increasing the fraction of low MW alginates to 0.50 maintained a value of E similar to that for the high MW alginate gels but led to faster degradation, irrespective of the cross-linking mode. This result was attributed to a faster separation between cross-linked domains upon chain breakages for the low MW alginates, coupled with their faster chain scission than the high MW alginates. The more rapidly degrading oxidized binary hydrogels facilitated the formation of new bone tissues from transplanted bone marrow stromal cells, as compared with the nonoxidized high MW hydrogels. The results of these studies will be useful for controlling the physical properties of a broad array of hydrogel-forming polymers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Cited by
Nam, S., & Mooney, D. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00798 · Cited by 764
Self-citationInjectable alginate hydrogels for cell delivery in tissue engineering
Bidarra, S. J., Barrias, C. C., & Granja, P. L. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.006 · Cited by 534
Kim, B. S., Das, S., Jang, J., & Cho, D.-W. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00808 · Cited by 465
Overcoming the translational barriers of tissue adhesives
Taboada, G. M., Yang, K., Pereira, M. J. N., Liu, S. S., Hu, Y., Karp, J. M., Artzi, N., & Lee, Y. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0171-7 · Cited by 449
Current advances and future perspectives of 3D printing natural-derived biopolymers
Liu, J., Sun, L., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Yu, S., & Sun, J. (2019) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.077 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, H. J., Kaigler, D., Kim, K., & Mooney, D. J.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-07-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1720-1727
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2061089961
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling Rigidity and Degradation of Alginate Hydrogels via Molecular Weight Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm049879r
- The paper
- Kong, H. J., Kaigler, D., Kim, K., & Mooney, D. J. (2004). Controlling Rigidity and Degradation of Alginate Hydrogels via Molecular Weight Distribution. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049879r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.