The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of the Surface Biocompatibility of the Electrospun PCL-Collagen Nanofibers Using Fibroblasts
Abstract
The effect of nanofiber surface coatings on the cell's proliferation behavior was studied. Individually collagen-coated poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibers (i.e., Collagen-r-PCL in the form of a core-shell structure) were prepared by a coaxial electrospinning technique. A roughly collagen-coated PCL nanofibrous matrix was also prepared by soaking the PCL matrix in a 10 mg/mL collagen solution overnight. These two types of coated nanofibers were then used to investigate differences in biological responses in terms of proliferation and cell morphology of human dermal fibroblasts (HDF). It was found that coatings of collagen on PCL nanofibrous matrix definitely favored cells proliferation, and the efficiency is coating means dependent. As compared to PCL, the HDF density on the Collagen-r-PCL nanofiber membrane almost increased linearly by 19.5% (2 days), 22.9% (4 days), and 31.8% (6 days). In contrast, the roughly collagen-coated PCL increased only by 5.5% (2 days), 11.0% (4 days), and 21.0% (6 days). SEM observation indicated that the Collagen-r-PCL nanofibers encouraged cell migration inside the scaffolds. These findings suggest that the Collagen-r-PCL nanofibers can be used as novel functional biomimetic nanofibers toward achieving excellent integration between cells and scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comparative Review of Natural and Synthetic Biopolymer Composite Scaffolds
Reddy, M. S. B., Ponnamma, D., Choudhary, R., & Sadasivuni, K. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13071105 · Cited by 1,104
Industrial Upscaling of Electrospinning and Applications of Polymer Nanofibers: A Review
Persano, L., Camposeo, A., Tekmen, C., & Pisignano, D. (2013) · Macromolecular Materials and Engineering · doi:10.1002/mame.201200290 · Cited by 965
One‐Dimensional Composite Nanomaterials: Synthesis by Electrospinning and Their Applications
Lu, X., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2009) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200900445 · Cited by 874
Jagur‐Grodzinski, J. (2006) · Polymers for Advanced Technologies · doi:10.1002/pat.729 · Cited by 394
Electrospun polymeric nanofibres as wound dressings: A review
Miguel, S. P., Figueira, D. R., Simões, D., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Ferreira, P., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.011 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y. Z., Venugopal, J., Huang, Z.-M., Lim, C. T., & Ramakrishna, S.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-07-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2583-2589
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2045312132
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of the Surface Biocompatibility of the Electrospun PCL-Collagen Nanofibers Using Fibroblasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm050314k
- The paper
- Zhang, Y. Z., Venugopal, J., Huang, Z.-M., Lim, C. T., & Ramakrishna, S. (2005). Characterization of the Surface Biocompatibility of the Electrospun PCL-Collagen Nanofibers Using Fibroblasts. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050314k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.