Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanofibrillation of Wood Pulp Using a High-Speed Blender

Uetani, Kojiro, Yano, Hiroyuki·2011·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

We report the successful use of a high-speed blender in nanofibrillating never-dried pulp to cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) with a uniform diameter of 15-20 nm. Pulp treated for 30 min in a blender showed the same degree of fibrillation with less damage to the CNF compared with that treated in a grinder. Observing the process of nanofibrillation clarified that the straw-like pulp was fibrillated in a very characteristic way, by forming many "balloon-like structures". As the balloons extended to the edges, the fibrils were rapidly individualized. However, the pulp fragments with ripped cell walls were split into finer fragments and gradually disintegrated into nanofibers. Changing the agitation speed and pulp concentration during the treatment revealed that the pulp concentration of 0.7 wt % at 37,000 rpm was the optimum fibrillation condition in this blender method. Through treatments in various NaCl solutions, the effect of the surface charge of CNF on the fibrillation was studied from the viewpoint of colloidal surface physics. It was found that repulsion due to the electric double layer of the CNF surface may play a critical role in the occurrence of fibrillation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm101103p

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Uetani, K., & Yano, H.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2010-12-29
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
348-353
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2314750170
Cited by
258
References
28
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.