Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuning β-Sheet Peptide Self-Assembly and Hydrogelation Behavior by Modification of Sequence Hydrophobicity and Aromaticity

Bowerman, Charles J., Liyanage, Wathsala, Federation, Alexander J., Nilsson, Bradley L.·2011·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Peptide self-assembly leading to cross-β amyloid structures is a widely studied phenomenon because of its role in amyloid pathology and the exploitation of amyloid as a functional biomaterial. The self-assembly process is governed by hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic, aromatic π-π, and electrostatic Coulombic interactions. A role for aromatic π-π interactions in peptide self-assembly leading to amyloid has been proposed, but the relative contributions of π-π versus general hydrophobic interactions in these processes are poorly understood. The Ac-(XKXK)(2)-NH(2) peptide was used to study the contributions of aromatic and hydrophobic interactions to peptide self-assembly. Position X was globally replaced by valine (Val), isoleucine (Ile), phenylalanine (Phe), pentafluorophenylalanine (F(5)-Phe), and cyclohexylalanine (Cha). At low pH, these peptides remain monomeric because of repulsion of charged lysine (Lys) residues. Increasing the solvent ionic strength to shield repulsive charge-charge interactions between protonated Lys residues facilitated cross-β fibril formation. It was generally found that as peptide hydrophobicity increased, the required ionic strength to induce self-assembly decreased. At [NaCl] ranging from 0 to 1000 mM, the Val sequence failed to assemble. Assembly of the Phe sequence commenced at 700 mM NaCl and at 300 mM NaCl for the less hydrophobic Ile variant, even though it displayed a mixture of random coil and β-sheet secondary structures over all NaCl concentrations. β-Sheet formation for F(5)-Phe and Cha sequences was observed at only 20 and 60 mM NaCl, respectively. Whereas self-assembly propensity generally correlated to peptide hydrophobicity and not aromatic character the presence of aromatic amino acids imparted unique properties to fibrils derived from these peptides. Nonaromatic peptides formed fibrils of 3-15 nm in diameter, whereas aromatic peptides formed nanotape or nanoribbon architectures of 3-7 nm widths. In addition, all peptides formed fibrillar hydrogels at sufficient peptide concentrations, but nonaromatic peptides formed weak gels, whereas aromatic peptides formed rigid gels. These findings clarify the influence of aromatic amino acids on peptide self-assembly processes and illuminate design principles for the inclusion of aromatic amino acids in amyloid-derived biomaterials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm200510k

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Bowerman, C. J., Liyanage, W., Federation, A. J., & Nilsson, B. L.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
2735-2745
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2323245805
Cited by
207
References
2
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.