The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Block versus Random Amphiphilic Copolymers as Antibacterial Agents
Abstract
We examined the antibacterial and hemolytic activities in a series of amphiphilic block and random copolymers of poly(vinyl ether) derivatives prepared by base-assisting living cationic polymerization. Block and random amphiphilic copolymers with similar monomer compositions showed the same level of activity against Escherichia coli . However, the block copolymers are much less hemolytic compared to the highly hemolytic random copolymers. These results indicate that the amphiphilic copolymer structure is a key determinant of activity. Furthermore, the block copolymers induced dye leakage from lipid vesicles consisting of E. coli -type lipids, but not mammalian lipids, while the random copolymers disrupted both types of vesicles. In addition, both copolymers displayed bactericidal and hemolytic activities at concentrations 1 or 2 orders of magnitude lower than their critical (intermolecular) aggregation concentrations (CACs), as determined by light scattering measurements. This suggests that polymer aggregation or macromolecular assembly is not a requisite for the antibacterial activity and selectivity against bacteria over human red blood cells (RBCs). We speculate that different single-chain conformations between the block and random copolymers play an important role in the antibacterial action and underlying antibacterial mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Synergistic activity of hydrophilic modification in antibiotic polymers
Sellenet, P. H., Allison, B., Applegate, B. M., & Youngblood, J. P. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0605513 · Cited by 130
Hemocompatibility of hydrophilic antimicrobial copolymers of alkylated 4-vinylpyridine
Allison, B. C., Applegate, B. M., & Youngblood, J. P. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm7004627 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Antimicrobial Polymeric Materials with Quaternary Ammonium and Phosphonium Salts
Xue, Y., Xiao, H., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16023626 · Cited by 578
Poly(trimethylene carbonate)-based polymers engineered for biodegradable functional biomaterials
Fukushima, K. (2016) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c5bm00123d · Cited by 335
Biomimetic antimicrobial polymers: recent advances in molecular design
Ergene, C., Yasuhara, K., & Palermo, E. F. (2018) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8py00012c · Cited by 312
Antimicrobial hydrogels: A new weapon in the arsenal against multidrug-resistant infections
Ng, V. W. L., Chan, J. M. W., Sardon, H., Ono, R. J., García, J. M., Yang, Y. Y., & Hedrick, J. L. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.028 · Cited by 279
Fernandes, S. C. M., Sadocco, P., Alonso-Varona, A., Palomares, T., Eceiza, A., Silvestre, A. J. D., Mondragon, I., & Freire, C. S. R. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am400338n · Cited by 274
Block versus Random Amphiphilic Glycopolymer Nanopaticles as Glucose-Responsive Vehicles
Guo, Q., Zhang, T., An, J., Wu, Z., Zhao, Y., Dai, X., Zhang, X., & Li, C. (2015) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01020 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Oda, Y., Kanaoka, S., Sato, T., Aoshima, S., & Kuroda, K.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3581-3591
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2330503753
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.