The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrically Conductive Chitosan/Carbon Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering
Open accessAbstract
In this work, carbon nanofibers were used as doping material to develop a highly conductive chitosan-based composite. Scaffolds based on chitosan only and chitosan/carbon composites were prepared by precipitation. Carbon nanofibers were homogeneously dispersed throughout the chitosan matrix, and the composite scaffold was highly porous with fully interconnected pores. Chitosan/carbon scaffolds had an elastic modulus of 28.1 ± 3.3 KPa, similar to that measured for rat myocardium, and excellent electrical properties, with a conductivity of 0.25 ± 0.09 S/m. The scaffolds were seeded with neonatal rat heart cells and cultured for up to 14 days, without electrical stimulation. After 14 days of culture, the scaffold pores throughout the construct volume were filled with cells. The metabolic activity of cells in chitosan/carbon constructs was significantly higher as compared to cells in chitosan scaffolds. The incorporation of carbon nanofibers also led to increased expression of cardiac-specific genes involved in muscle contraction and electrical coupling. This study demonstrates that the incorporation of carbon nanofibers into porous chitosan scaffolds improved the properties of cardiac tissue constructs, presumably through enhanced transmission of electrical signals between the cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
Cited by
3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications
Do, A., Khorsand, B., Geary, S. M., & Salem, A. K. (2015) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201500168 · Cited by 949
Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment
Huang, G., Li, F., Zhao, X., Ma, Y., Li, Y., Lin, M., Jin, G., Lu, T. J., Genin, G. M., & Xu, F. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00094 · Cited by 825
Fabrication of Biomedical Scaffolds Using Biodegradable Polymers.
Kirillova, A., Yeazel, T. R., Asheghali, D., Petersen, S. R., Dort, S., Gall, K., & Becker, M. L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01200 · Cited by 368
Baei, P., Jalili-Firoozinezhad, S., Rajabi-Zeleti, S., Tafazzoli-Shadpour, M., Baharvand, H., & Aghdami, N. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.056 · Cited by 351
Electroactive polymers for tissue regeneration: Developments and perspectives
Ning, C., Zhou, Z., Tan, G., Zhu, Y., & Mao, C. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.001 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Martins, A. M., Eng, G., Caridade, S. G., Mano, J. F., Reis, R. L., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-01-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 635-643
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2060953325
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrically Conductive Chitosan/Carbon Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bm401679q
- The paper
- Martins, A. M., Eng, G., Caridade, S. G., Mano, J. F., Reis, R. L., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2014). Electrically Conductive Chitosan/Carbon Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Biomacromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm401679q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.