The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unprecedented Access to Strong and Ductile Poly(lactic acid) by Introducing In Situ Nanofibrillar Poly(butylene succinate) for Green Packaging
Abstract
The notion of toughening poly(lactic acid) (PLA) by adding flexible biopolymers has generated enormous interest but has yielded few desirable advances, mainly blocked by the sacrifice of strength and stiffness due to uncontrollable phase morphology and poor interfacial interactions. Here the phase control methodology, that is, intense extrusion compounding followed by "slit die extrusion-hot stretching-quenching" technique, was proposed to construct well-aligned, stiff poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) nanofibrils in the PLA matrix for the first time. We show that generating nanosized discrete droplets of PBS phase during extrusion compounding is key to enable the development of in situ nanofibrillar PBS assisted by the shearing/stretching field. The size of PBS nanofibrils strongly dependent on the PBS content, showing an increased average diameter from 83 to 116 and 236 nm for the composites containing 10, 20, and 40 wt % nanofibrils, respectively. More importantly, hybrid shish-kebab superstructure anchoring ordered PLA kebabs were induced by the PBS nanofibrils serving as the central shish, conferring the creation of tenacious interfacial crystalline ligaments. The exceptional combination of strength, modulus, and ductility for the composites loaded 40 wt % PBS nanofibrils were demonstrated, outperforming pure PLA with the increments of 31, 51, and 72% in strength, modulus, and elongation at break (56.4 MPa, 1702 MPa, and 92.4%), respectively. The high strength, modulus, and ductility are unprecedented for PLA and are in great potential need for packaging applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plasticization of Poly(l-lactide) with Poly(propylene glycol)
Kulinski, Z., Piorkowska, E., Gadzinowska, K., & Stasiak, M. (2006) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm060089m · Cited by 320
Hu, Y., Hu, Y. S., Topolkaraev, V., Hiltner, A., & Baer, E. (2003) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00615-3 · Cited by 258
Khoshkava, V., & Kamal, M. R. (2013) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm400784j · Cited by 235
Cited by
A Review on Properties and Application of Bio-Based Poly(Butylene Succinate)
Rafiqah, S. A., Khalina, A., Harmaen, A. S., Tawakkal, I. A., Zaman, K., Asim, M., Nurrazi, M. N., & Lee, C. H. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13091436 · Cited by 398
Shahnooshi, M., Schneider, K., Javadi, A., & Altstädt, V. (2023) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2023.126254 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, L., Xu, H., Niu, B., Ji, X., Chen, J., Li, Z.-M., Hsiao, B. S., & Zhong, G.-J.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-10-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4054-4064
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2334008639
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.