The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer-Modified Gadolinium Metal-Organic Framework Nanoparticles Used as Multifunctional Nanomedicines for the Targeted Imaging and Treatment of Cancer
Abstract
Novel nanoscale theragnostic devices were successfully prepared through attachment of well defined, multifunctional polymer chains to gadolinium (Gd) metal-organic framework (MOF) nanoparticles. Copolymers of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-co-poly(N-acryloxysuccinimide)-co-poly(fluorescein O-methacrylate) were prepared via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. The succinimide functionality was utilized as a scaffold for attachment of both a therapeutic agent, such as methotrexate, and a targeting ligand, such as H-glycine-arginine-glycine-aspartate-serine-NH(2) peptide. Employment of a trithiocarbonate RAFT agent allowed for reduction of the polymer end groups to thiolates providing a means of copolymer attachment through vacant orbitals on the Gd(3+) ions at the surface of the Gd MOF nanoparticles. These versatile, nanoscale scaffolds were shown to be biocompatible and have cancer cell targeting, bimodal imaging, and disease treatment capabilities. This unique method provided a simple yet versatile route of producing polymer-nanoparticle theragnostic materials with an unprecedented degree of flexibility in the construct, potentially allowing for tunable loading capacities and spatial loading of targeting/treatment agents, while incorporating bimodal imaging capabilities through both magnetic resonance and fluorescence microscopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multifunctional polymeric micelles as cancer-targeted, MRI-ultrasensitive drug delivery systems
Nasongkla, N., Bey, E., Ren, J., Ai, H., Khemtong, C., Guthi, J. S., Chin, S.-F., Sherry, A. D., Boothman, D. A., & Gao, J. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl061412u · Cited by 1,238
Kojima, C., Kono, K., Maruyama, K., & Takagishi, T. (2000) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc0000583 · Cited by 663
Cited by
Postsynthetic Methods for the Functionalization of Metal–Organic Frameworks
Cohen, S. M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200179u · Cited by 2,336
Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks for Biomedical Imaging and Drug Delivery
Della Rocca, J., Liu, D., & Lin, W. (2011) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar200028a · Cited by 2,087
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Bioapplications of RAFT Polymerization
Boyer, C., Bulmus, V., Davis, T. P., Ladmiral, V., Liu, J., & Perrier, S. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001403 · Cited by 1,015
The surface chemistry of metal–organic frameworks
McGuire, C. V., & Forgan, R. S. (2015) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c4cc04458d · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowe, M. D., Thamm, D. H., Kraft, S. L., & Boyes, S. G.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 983-993
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W1985076352
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.