The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biosorption of Heavy Metals
Abstract
Only within the past decade has the potential of metal biosorption by biomass materials been well established. For economic reasons, of particular interest are abundant biomass types generated as a waste byproduct of large‐scale industrial fermentations or certain metal‐binding algae found in large quantities in the sea. These biomass types serve as a basis for newly developed metal biosorption processes foreseen particularly as a very competitive means for the detoxification of metal‐bearing industrial effluents. The assessment of the metal‐binding capacity of some new biosorbents is discussed. Lead and cadmium, for instance, have been effectively removed from very dilute solutions by the dried biomass of some ubiquitous species of brown marine algae such as Ascophyllum and Sargassum, which accumulate more than 30% of biomass dry weight in the metal. Mycelia of the industrial steroid‐transforming fungi Rhizopus and Absidia are excellent biosorbents for lead, cadmium, copper, zinc, and uranium and also bind other heavy metals up to 25% of the biomass dry weight. Biosorption isotherm curves, derived from equilibrium batch sorption experiments, are used in the evaluation of metal uptake by different biosorbents. Further studies are focusing on the assessment of biosorbent performance in dynamic continuous‐flow sorption systems. In the course of this work, new methodologies are being developed that are aimed at mathematical modeling of biosorption systems and their effective optimization. Elucidation of mechanisms active in metal biosorption is essential for successful exploitation of the phenomenon and for regeneration of biosorbent materials in multiple reuse cycles. The complex nature of biosorbent materials makes this task particularly challenging. Discussion focuses on the composition of marine algae polysaccharide structures, which seem instrumental in metal uptake and binding. The state of the art in the field of biosorption is reviewed in this article, with many references to recent reviews and key individual contributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae
Davis, T. A., Volesky, B., & Mucci, A. (2003) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00293-8 · Cited by 2,394
Self-citationMetals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0 · Cited by 2,013
Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water
Mohan, D., & Pittman Jr., C. U. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.060 · Cited by 1,855
Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater
Ahluwalia, S. S., & Goyal, D. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.006 · Cited by 1,586
Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste materials: a review
Demirbas, A. (2008) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.024 · Cited by 1,566
Metadata
- Authors
- Volesky, B., & Holan, Z. R.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-250
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W1976347027
- Cited by
- 3,326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 124.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biosorption of Heavy Metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/bp00033a001
- The paper
- Volesky, B., & Holan, Z. R. (1995). Biosorption of Heavy Metals. Biotechnology Progress. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00033a001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.