pH, pCO 2 , and Temperature Effect on R‐Adenovirus Production
Abstract
The effects of pH, carbon dioxide vapor pressure, pCO 2 , and temperature on E1 and E3 deleted recombinant adenovirus vector (rAV) production with HEK293S cells have been studied in the ranges of pH = 6.7–7.7, pCO 2 = 0.05–0.20 atm, and T = 32–39 °C, respectively. The experiments were performed in four 500‐mL bioreactors in parallel, which make possible the reduction of inter‐run variability. Cell concentration and viability, relative oxygen uptake rate (OUR), fluorescence, and viral titer were measured. It was found that, although pH and pCO 2 did not affect significantly cell viability in the range studied, they had an important effect on virus titer. pCO 2 allowed the maximum production of rAV at 0.05 atm, and pH showed a very sharp optimum at 7.2. Temperature had an effect on both cell metabolism and virus titer. Low temperature prolonged cell viability and high OUR. Most of all, a 3‐fold increase in virus yield was found at 35 °C compared to that at 37 °C, while 32 °C was not as beneficial (1.5‐fold increase). This finding could have an important impact on large‐scale production. This phenomenon was modeled using a simple 3‐parameter synthesis‐decay model. This model shows how the optimum gain in virus production at 35 °C is due to a balance between the production and decay processes at that temperature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virus degradation occurs mainly in dead cells as a result of the lower internal pH of dead cells.
“Since virus degradation occurs mainly in dead cells, as a result of the lower internal pH of dead cells, this behavior can be modeled by relating a deactivation rate coefficient ckp to the loss of viability (xVCD divided by total cell density) [23].”
From Mechanistic model for HEK293 viral vector processes and its application in a digital shadow framework (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
CO2 in large-scale and high-density CHO cell perfusion culture
Gray, D. R., Chen, S., Howarth, W., Inlow, D., & Maiorella, B. L. (1996) · Cytotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf00353925 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blombach, B., & Takors, R. (2015) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00108 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Kuchemüller, K. B., Austerjost, J., Machleid, R., Roßkamp, A., Niemann, J., & McCready, C. (2026) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-026-03362-2
- Authors
- Jardon, M., & Garnier, A.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 202-208
- ISSN
- 8756-7938
- 1520-6033
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review