The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Inhibitors Released during Steam-Explosion Treatment of Poplar Wood on Subsequent Enzymatic Hydrolysis and SSF
Abstract
Steam-exploded (SE) poplar wood biomass was hydrolyzed by means of a blend of Celluclast and Novozym cellulase complexes in the presence of the inhibiting compounds produced during the preceding steam-explosion pretreatment process. The SE temperature and time conditions were 214 degrees C and 6 min, resulting in a log R(0) of 4.13. In enzymatic hydrolysis tests at 45 degrees C, the biomass loading in the bioreactor was 100 g(DW)/L (dry weight) and the enzyme-to-biomass ratio 0.06 g/g(DW). The enzyme activities for endo-glucanase, exo-glucanase, and beta-glucosidase were 5.76, 0.55, and 5.98 U/mg, respectively. The inhibiting effects of components released during SE (formic, acetic, and levulinic acids, furfural, 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (5-HMF), syringaldehyde, 4-hydroxy benzaldehyde, and vanillin) were studied at different concentrations in hydrolysis runs performed with rinsed SE biomass as model substrate. Acetic acid (2 g/L), furfural, 5-HMF, syringaldehyde, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, and vanillin (0.5 g/L) did not significantly effect the enzyme activity, whereas formic acid (11.5 g/L) inactivated the enzymes and levulinic acid (29.0 g/L) partially affected the cellulase. Synergism and cumulative concentration effects of these compounds were not detected. SSF experiments show that untreated SE biomass during the enzymatic attack gives rise to a nonfermentable hydrolysate, which becomes fermentable when rinsed SE biomass is used. The presence of acetic acid, vanillin, and 5-HMF (0.5 g/L) in SSF of 100 g(DW) /L biomass gave rise to ethanol yields of 84.0%, 73.5%, and 91.0% respectively, with respective lag phases of 42, 39, and 58 h.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production
Olsson, L., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1996) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/0141-0229(95)00157-3 · Cited by 783
Abatzoglou, N., Chornet, E., Belkacemi, K., & Overend, R. P. (1992) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/0009-2509(92)80235-5 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities
Jørgensen, H., Kristensen, J. B., & Felby, C. (2007) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.4 · Cited by 1,143
Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Materials for Efficient Bioethanol Production
Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2007) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2007_070 · Cited by 816
Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production.
Zheng, Y., Pan, Z., & Zhang, R. (2009) · International journal of agricultural and biological engineering · doi:10.25165/ijabe.v2i3.168 · Cited by 585
RNAi-mediated crop protection against insects
Price, D. R. G., & Gatehouse, J. A. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.004 · Cited by 585
Soluble inhibitors/deactivators of cellulase enzymes from lignocellulosic biomass
Kim, Y., Ximenes, E., Mosier, N. S., & Ladisch, M. R. (2011) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.01.007 · Cited by 477
Parawira, W., & Tekere, M. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551003757816 · Cited by 434
Öhgren, K., Bura, R., Lesnicki, G., Saddler, J., & Zacchi, G. (2007) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2007.02.003 · Cited by 357
Green methods of lignocellulose pretreatment for biorefinery development
Capolupo, L., & Faraco, V. (2016) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-016-7884-y · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantarella, M., Cantarella, L., Gallifuoco, A., Spera, A., & Alfani, F.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 200-206
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2082964431
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.