The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomimetic Peptide Surfaces That Regulate Adhesion, Spreading, Cytoskeletal Organization, and Mineralization of the Matrix Deposited by Osteoblast-like Cells
Abstract
In an effort to regulate mammalian cell behavior in contact with solid material surfaces, we have functionalized surfaces with different ratios of both the putative cell binding (-Arg-Gly-Asp-) domain and a consensus heparan-binding domain. The peptide sequences -Arg-Gly-Asp- (-RGD-) and -Phe-His-Arg-Arg-Ile-Lys-Ala- (-FHRRIKA-) or mixtures of the two in the ratios of 75:25 (mimetic peptide surface I), 25:75 (mimetic peptide surface II), and 50:50 (mimetic peptide surface III) were immobilized on model surfaces using a heterobifunctional cross-linker to link the peptide(s) to amine-functionalized quartz surfaces. Contact angle measurements, spectroscopic ellipsometry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used to confirm the chemistry, thickness of the overlayers, and surface density of immobilized peptides ( approximately 4-6 pmol/cm2). The degree of rat calvaria osteoblast-like cell spreading, focal contact formation, cytoskeletal organization, proliferation, and mineralization of the extracellular matrix (ECM) on model biomaterial surfaces was examined. Mimetic peptide surface II (MPS II) and MPS III supported the highest degree of cell spreading (p < 0.05), following 4 h of incubation, compared to MPS I, homogeneous -RGD-, and homogeneous -FHRRIKA- grafted surfaces. Furthermore, MPS I, MPS II, MPS III, and homogeneous -RGD- surfaces promoted the formation of focal contacts and stress fibers by attached bone cells. The strength of bone cell detachment following 30 min of incubation was significantly higher (p < 0.05) on MPS II surfaces compared to homogeneous -RGD- and -FHRRIKA-. However, the degree of cell proliferation on the peptide surfaces were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.1). Following 24 d in culture, the areas of mineralized ECM formed on MPS II and MPS III surfaces were significantly (p < 0.05) larger than those of other surfaces. These results demonstrate that utilizing peptide sequences incorporating both cell- and heparin-adhesive motifs can enhance the degree of cell surface interactions and influence the long-term formation of mineralized ECM in vitro.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond
Hersel, U., Dahmen, C., & Kessler, H. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00343-0 · Cited by 2,582
Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review
Wilson, C. J., Clegg, R. E., Leavesley, D. I., & Pearcy, M. J. (2005) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1 · Cited by 1,696
Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering
Shin, H., Jo, S., & Mikos, A. G. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00339-9 · Cited by 1,612
Burdick, J. A., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00176-x · Cited by 1,008
Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials
Bellis, S. L. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029 · Cited by 745
Biocompatible polymer materials: Role of protein–surface interactions
Chen, H., Yuan, L., Song, W., Wu, Z., & Li, D. (2008) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.006 · Cited by 706
The role of surface science in bioengineered materials
Tirrell, M., Kokkoli, E., & Biesalski, M. (2002) · Surface Science · doi:10.1016/s0039-6028(01)01548-5 · Cited by 447
Zhao, F., Yin, Y., Lu, W. W., Leong, J. C., Zhang, W., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., & Yao, K. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00077-7 · Cited by 431
The effect of hydrogel charge density on cell attachment
Schneider, G. B., English, A., Abraham, M., Zaharias, R., Stanford, C., & Keller, J. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.084 · Cited by 314
Extracellular Matrix Cell Adhesion Peptides: Functional Applications in Orthopedic Materials
LeBaron, R. G., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2000) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632700320720 · Cited by 306
Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration
Bueno, E. M., & Glowacki, J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2009.228 · Cited by 279
Yang, X. B., Roach, H. I., Clarke, N. M. P., Howdle, S. M., Quirk, R., Shakesheff, K. M., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2001) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00617-2 · Cited by 277
Azadi, S., Yazdanpanah, M. A., Afshari, A., Alahdad, N., Chegeni, S., Angaji, A., Rezayat, S. M., & Tavakol, S. (2024) · Journal of Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1177/20417314241303818 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Rezania, A., & Healy, K. E.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-02-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-32
- ISSN
- 1520-6033 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2077094332
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.