The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaffold Architecture and Pharmacophoric Properties of Natural Products and Trade Drugs: Application in the Design of Natural Product-Based Combinatorial Libraries
Abstract
Natural products were analyzed to determine whether they contain appealing novel scaffold architectures for potential use in combinatorial chemistry. Ring systems were extracted and clustered on the basis of structural similarity. Several such potential scaffolds for combinatorial chemistry were identified that are not present in current trade drugs. For one of these scaffolds a virtual combinatorial library was generated. Pharmacophoric properties of natural products, trade drugs, and the virtual combinatorial library were assessed using a self-organizing map. Obviously, current trade drugs and natural products have several topological pharmacophore patterns in common. These features can be systematically explored with selected combinatorial libraries based on a combination of natural product-derived and synthetic molecular building blocks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399
Handbook of Molecular Descriptors
Todeschini, R., & Consonni, V. (2000) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527613106 · Cited by 4,107
Can We Learn To Distinguish between “Drug-like” and “Nondrug-like” Molecules?
Ajay, Walters, W. P., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970666c · Cited by 484
A Scoring Scheme for Discriminating between Drugs and Nondrugs
Sadowski, J., & Kubinyi, H. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm9706776 · Cited by 392
Cited by
The evolving role of natural products in drug discovery
Koehn, F. E., & Carter, G. T. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1657 · Cited by 2,572
Privileged scaffolds for library design and drug discovery
Welsch, M. E., Snyder, S. A., & Stockwell, B. R. (2010) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.02.018 · Cited by 1,509
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationNew aspects of natural products in drug discovery
Lam, K. S. (2007) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.04.001 · Cited by 531
The application of in silico drug-likeness predictions in pharmaceutical research
Tian, S., Wang, J., Li, Y., Li, D., Xu, L., & Hou, T. (2015) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.009 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M.-L., & Schneider, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-289
- ISSN
- 1520-4766 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4774
- OpenAlex
- W1969921890
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
