The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients from PHYSPROP Database Using Artificial Neural Networks and E-State Indices
Abstract
A new method, ALOGPS v 2.0 (http://www.lnh.unil.ch/~itetko/logp/), for the assessment of n-octanol/water partition coefficient, log P, was developed on the basis of neural network ensemble analysis of 12 908 organic compounds available from PHYSPROP database of Syracuse Research Corporation. The atom and bond-type E-state indices as well as the number of hydrogen and non-hydrogen atoms were used to represent the molecular structures. A preliminary selection of indices was performed by multiple linear regression analysis, and 75 input parameters were chosen. Some of the parameters combined several atom-type or bond-type indices with similar physicochemical properties. The neural network ensemble training was performed by efficient partition algorithm developed by the authors. The ensemble contained 50 neural networks, and each neural network had 10 neurons in one hidden layer. The prediction ability of the developed approach was estimated using both leave-one-out (LOO) technique and training/test protocol. In case of interseries predictions, i.e., when molecules in the test and in the training subsets were selected by chance from the same set of compounds, both approaches provided similar results. ALOGPS performance was significantly better than the results obtained by other tested methods. For a subset of 12 777 molecules the LOO results, namely correlation coefficient r(2)= 0.95, root mean squared error, RMSE = 0.39, and an absolute mean error, MAE = 0.29, were calculated. For two cross-series predictions, i.e., when molecules in the training and in the test sets belong to different series of compounds, all analyzed methods performed less efficiently. The decrease in the performance could be explained by a different diversity of molecules in the training and in the test sets. However, even for such difficult cases the ALOGPS method provided better prediction ability than the other tested methods. We have shown that the diversity of the training sets rather than the design of the methods is the main factor determining their prediction ability for new data. A comparative performance of the methods as well as a dependence on the number of non-hydrogen atoms in a molecule is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725382 · Cited by 5,609
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578
Atom/Fragment Contribution Method for Estimating Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients
Meylan, W. M., & Howard, P. H. (1995) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600840120 · Cited by 860
Ghose, A. K., Viswanadhan, V. N., & Wendoloski, J. J. (1998) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp980230o · Cited by 790
Neural network studies. 1. Comparison of overfitting and overtraining
Tetko, I. V., Livingstone, D. J., & Luik, A. I. (1995) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci00027a006 · Cited by 574
Self-citationMolecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State
Kier, L. B., & Hall, L. H. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 467
SuperSAB: Fast adaptive back propagation with good scaling properties
Tollenaere, T. (1990) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(90)90006-7 · Cited by 359
Katritzky, A. R., Maran, U., Lobanov, V. S., & Karelson, M. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci9903206 · Cited by 271
Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design
(1996) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-213815-7.x5000-6 · Cited by 221
Calculating partition coefficient by atom-additive method
Wang, R., Gao, Y., & Lai, L. (2000) · Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design · doi:10.1023/a:1008763405023 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory – Design and Description
Tetko, I. V., Gasteiger, J., Todeschini, R., Mauri, A., Livingstone, D., Ertl, P., Palyulin, V. A., Radchenko, E. V., Zefirov, N. S., Makarenko, A. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-005-8694-y · Cited by 1,500
Self-citationSushko, I., Novotarskyi, S., Körner, R., Pandey, A. K., Rupp, M., Teetz, W., Brandmaier, S., Abdelaziz, A., Prokopenko, V. V., Tanchuk, V. Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9440-2 · Cited by 686
Self-citationMannhold, R., Poda, G. I., Ostermann, C., & Tetko, I. V. (2009) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.21494 · Cited by 654
Self-citationRayne, S., & Forest, K. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/10934520903139811 · Cited by 475
Vatansever, S., Schlessinger, A., Wacker, D., Kaniskan, H. Ü., Jin, J., Zhou, M., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21764 · Cited by 429
Tetko, I. V., Sushko, I., Pandey, A. K., Zhu, H., Tropsha, A., Papa, E., Öberg, T., Todeschini, R., Fourches, D., & Varnek, A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800151m · Cited by 416
Self-citationCombinatorial QSAR Modeling of Chemical Toxicants Tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis
Zhu, H., Tropsha, A., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Papa, E., Gramatica, P., Öberg, T., Dao, P., Cherkasov, A., & Tetko, I. V. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci700443v · Cited by 287
Self-citationVarnek, A., Gaudin, C., Marcou, G., Baskin, I., Pandey, A. K., & Tetko, I. V. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci8002914 · Cited by 86
Self-citationJämbeck, J. P. M., & Lyubartsev, A. P. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp4111234 · Cited by 73
Early ADME/T Predictions: Toy or Tool?
Tetko, I. V., & Oprea, T. I. (2008) · Chemoinformatics Approaches to Virtual Screening · doi:10.1039/9781847558879-00240 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tetko, I. V., Tanchuk, V. Y., & Villa, A. E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-08-25
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1407-1421
- ISSN
- 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068950612
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
