Cited by 86Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceNeural Networks and Applications

Inductive Transfer of Knowledge: Application of Multi-Task Learning and Feature Net Approaches to Model Tissue-Air Partition Coefficients

Varnek, Alexandre, Gaudin, Cédric, Marcou, Gilles, Baskin, Igor, Pandey, Anil Kumar, Tetko, Igor V.·2009·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

Two inductive knowledge transfer approaches - multitask learning (MTL) and Feature Net (FN) - have been used to build predictive neural networks (ASNN) and PLS models for 11 types of tissue-air partition coefficients (TAPC). Unlike conventional single-task learning (STL) modeling focused only on a single target property without any relations to other properties, in the framework of inductive transfer approach, the individual models are viewed as nodes in the network of interrelated models built in parallel (MTL) or sequentially (FN). It has been demonstrated that MTL and FN techniques are extremely useful in structure-property modeling on small and structurally diverse data sets, when conventional STL modeling is unable to produce any predictive model. The predictive STL individual models were obtained for 4 out of 11 TAPC, whereas application of inductive knowledge transfer techniques resulted in models for 9 TAPC. Differences in prediction performances of the models as a function of the machine-learning method, and of the number of properties simultaneously involved in the learning, has been discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci8002914

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single layer NNs with multiple output nodes can also model multiple activities, but other ML methods cannot.

    “the same is true for single layer NNs with multiple output nodes69 but not so for other ML methods.”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [69]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varnek, A., Gaudin, C., Marcou, G., Baskin, I., Pandey, A. K., & Tetko, I. V.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Varnek, Alexandre
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2009-01-06
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
133-144
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2064176611
Cited by
86
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
multi-task learning, predictive neural networks, partial least squares
MeSH terms
Air, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Models, Biological, Organic Chemicals, Tissue Distribution, Linear Models, Least-Squares Analysis, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Informatics, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review