Inductive Transfer of Knowledge: Application of Multi-Task Learning and Feature Net Approaches to Model Tissue-Air Partition Coefficients
Abstract
Two inductive knowledge transfer approaches - multitask learning (MTL) and Feature Net (FN) - have been used to build predictive neural networks (ASNN) and PLS models for 11 types of tissue-air partition coefficients (TAPC). Unlike conventional single-task learning (STL) modeling focused only on a single target property without any relations to other properties, in the framework of inductive transfer approach, the individual models are viewed as nodes in the network of interrelated models built in parallel (MTL) or sequentially (FN). It has been demonstrated that MTL and FN techniques are extremely useful in structure-property modeling on small and structurally diverse data sets, when conventional STL modeling is unable to produce any predictive model. The predictive STL individual models were obtained for 4 out of 11 TAPC, whereas application of inductive knowledge transfer techniques resulted in models for 9 TAPC. Differences in prediction performances of the models as a function of the machine-learning method, and of the number of properties simultaneously involved in the learning, has been discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Single layer NNs with multiple output nodes can also model multiple activities, but other ML methods cannot.
“the same is true for single layer NNs with multiple output nodes69 but not so for other ML methods.”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Caruana, R. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007379606734 · Cited by 6,636 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164 · see citing works
Self-citationMuratov, E. N., Bajorath, J., Sheridan, R. P., Tetko, I. V., Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Oprea, T. I., Baskin, I. I., Varnek, A., Roitberg, A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00098a · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Self-citationDemystifying Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships
Xu, Y., Ma, J., Liaw, A., Sheridan, R. P., & Svetnik, V. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00087 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
A renaissance of neural networks in drug discovery
Baskin, I. I., Winkler, D., & Tetko, I. V. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2016.1201262 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?
Hasselgren, C., & Oprea, T. I. (2024) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-040323-040828 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
“OCHEM provides a uniform interface for multi-task learning (129), a method that promises improved prediction performance (130).”
MethodComparative Study of Multitask Toxicity Modeling on a Broad Chemical Space
Sosnin, S., Karlov, D., Tetko, I. V., & Fedorov, M. V. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00685 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“It was shown that the Feature Net approach can achieve better accuracy than single-task learning 61 and can provide models with similar accuracy to MT models.”
MethodSelf-citation
- Authors
- Varnek, A., Gaudin, C., Marcou, G., Baskin, I., Pandey, A. K., & Tetko, I. V.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Varnek, Alexandre
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-01-06
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-144
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2064176611
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- multi-task learning, predictive neural networks, partial least squares
- MeSH terms
- Air, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Models, Biological, Organic Chemicals, Tissue Distribution, Linear Models, Least-Squares Analysis, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Informatics, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review