The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Biological Targets for Compounds Using Multiple-Category Bayesian Models Trained on Chemogenomics Databases
Abstract
Target identification is a critical step following the discovery of small molecules that elicit a biological phenotype. The present work seeks to provide an in silico correlate of experimental target fishing technologies in order to rapidly fish out potential targets for compounds on the basis of chemical structure alone. A multiple-category Laplacian-modified naïve Bayesian model was trained on extended-connectivity fingerprints of compounds from 964 target classes in the WOMBAT (World Of Molecular BioAcTivity) chemogenomics database. The model was employed to predict the top three most likely protein targets for all MDDR (MDL Drug Database Report) database compounds. On average, the correct target was found 77% of the time for compounds from 10 MDDR activity classes with known targets. For MDDR compounds annotated with only therapeutic or generic activities such as "antineoplastic", "kinase inhibitor", or "anti-inflammatory", the model was able to systematically deconvolute the generic activities to specific targets associated with the therapeutic effect. Examples of successful deconvolution are given, demonstrating the usefulness of the tool for improving knowledge in chemogenomics databases and for predicting new targets for orphan compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haggarty, S. J., Clemons, P. A., & Schreiber, S. L. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja035413p · Cited by 61
Cited by
Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry
Keiser, M. J., Roth, B. L., Armbruster, B. N., Ernsberger, P., Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1284 · Cited by 2,402
Vatansever, S., Schlessinger, A., Wacker, D., Kaniskan, H. Ü., Jin, J., Zhou, M., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21764 · Cited by 429
Kell, D. B. (2010) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-010-0577-x · Cited by 361
Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action
Young, D. W., Bender, A., Hoyt, J., McWhinnie, E., Chirn, G.-W., Tao, C. Y., Tallarico, J. A., Labow, M., Jenkins, J. L., Mitchison, T. J., et al. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2007.53 · Cited by 345
Self-citationPotential of quantum computing for drug discovery
Cao, Y., Romero, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2018.2888987 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Nidhi, Glick, M., Davies, J. W., & Jenkins, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-03-22
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1124-1133
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2099536767
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Biological Targets for Compounds Using Multiple-Category Bayesian Models Trained on Chemogenomics Databases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ci060003g
- The paper
- Nidhi, Glick, M., Davies, J. W., & Jenkins, J. L. (2006). Prediction of Biological Targets for Compounds Using Multiple-Category Bayesian Models Trained on Chemogenomics Databases. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci060003g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.