Cited by 345Computational Drug Discovery MethodsCell Image Analysis TechniquesMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action

Young, Daniel W, Bender, Andreas, Hoyt, Jonathan, McWhinnie, Elizabeth, Chirn, Gung-Wei, Tao, Charles Y, Tallarico, John A, Labow, Mark +3 more·2008·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

High-content screening is transforming drug discovery by enabling simultaneous measurement of multiple features of cellular phenotype that are relevant to therapeutic and toxic activities of compounds. High-content screening studies typically generate immense datasets of image-based phenotypic information, and how best to mine relevant phenotypic data is an unsolved challenge. Here, we introduce factor analysis as a data-driven tool for defining cell phenotypes and profiling compound activities. This method allows a large data reduction while retaining relevant information, and the data-derived factors used to quantify phenotype have discernable biological meaning. We used factor analysis of cells stained with fluorescent markers of cell cycle state to profile a compound library and cluster the hits into seven phenotypic categories. We then compared phenotypic profiles, chemical similarity and predicted protein binding activities of active compounds. By integrating these different descriptors of measured and potential biological activity, we can effectively draw mechanism-of-action inferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.2007.53

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 345

Authors
Young, D. W., Bender, A., Hoyt, J., McWhinnie, E., Chirn, G.-W., Tao, C. Y., Tallarico, J. A., Labow, M., Jenkins, J. L., Mitchison, T. J., & Feng, Y.
Affiliations
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jenkins, Jeremy L
  • Feng, Yan
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2007-12-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
59-68
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W1998202992
Cited by
345
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
23.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA078048, CA78048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
high-content screening, mechanism of action, factor analysis, phenotypic profiling, cell cycle, molecular similarity, protein binding prediction
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Cycle, Cell Nucleus, DNA Replication, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, HeLa Cells, Humans, Ligands, Predictive Value of Tests, Protein Binding, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Design, Models, Statistical, Molecular Structure, Cluster Analysis, Computational Biology, Cell Proliferation, Small Molecule Libraries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review