Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action
Abstract
High-content screening is transforming drug discovery by enabling simultaneous measurement of multiple features of cellular phenotype that are relevant to therapeutic and toxic activities of compounds. High-content screening studies typically generate immense datasets of image-based phenotypic information, and how best to mine relevant phenotypic data is an unsolved challenge. Here, we introduce factor analysis as a data-driven tool for defining cell phenotypes and profiling compound activities. This method allows a large data reduction while retaining relevant information, and the data-derived factors used to quantify phenotype have discernable biological meaning. We used factor analysis of cells stained with fluorescent markers of cell cycle state to profile a compound library and cluster the hits into seven phenotypic categories. We then compared phenotypic profiles, chemical similarity and predicted protein binding activities of active compounds. By integrating these different descriptors of measured and potential biological activity, we can effectively draw mechanism-of-action inferences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Total DNA intensity is an indicator of cell cycle phase.
“Total DNA intensity is an indicator of cell cycle phase that is regularly measured in both flow cytometry29 and HCS cell proliferation assays17.”
From A statistical framework for high-content phenotypic profiling using cellular feature distributions (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 345
- Authors
- Young, D. W., Bender, A., Hoyt, J., McWhinnie, E., Chirn, G.-W., Tao, C. Y., Tallarico, J. A., Labow, M., Jenkins, J. L., Mitchison, T. J., & Feng, Y.
- Affiliations
- Novartis (United States) (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jenkins, Jeremy L
- Feng, Yan
- Venue
- Nature Chemical Biology
- Published
- 2007-12-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-68
- ISSN
- 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4469
- OpenAlex
- W1998202992
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 23.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (P01CA078048, CA78048)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Keywords
- high-content screening, mechanism of action, factor analysis, phenotypic profiling, cell cycle, molecular similarity, protein binding prediction
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Cycle, Cell Nucleus, DNA Replication, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, HeLa Cells, Humans, Ligands, Predictive Value of Tests, Protein Binding, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Design, Models, Statistical, Molecular Structure, Cluster Analysis, Computational Biology, Cell Proliferation, Small Molecule Libraries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review