The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ConfGen: A Conformational Search Method for Efficient Generation of Bioactive Conformers
Abstract
We describe the methodology, parametrization, and application of a conformational search method, called ConfGen, designed to efficiently generate bioactive conformers. We define efficiency as the ability to generate a bioactive conformation within a small total number of conformations using a reasonable amount of computer time. The method combines physics-based force field calculations with empirically derived heuristics designed to achieve efficient searching and prioritization of the ligand's conformational space. While many parameter settings are supported, four modes spanning a range of speed and quality trades-offs are defined and characterized. The validation set used to test the method is composed of ligands from 667 crystal structures covering a broad array of target and ligand classes. With the fastest mode, ConfGen uses an average of 0.5 s per ligand and generates only 14.3 conformers per ligand, at least one of which lies within 2.0 A root-mean-squared deviation of the crystal structure for 96% of the ligands. The most computationally intensive mode raises this recovery rate to 99%, while taking 8 s per ligand. Combining multiple search modes to "fill-in" holes in the conformation space or energy minimizing using an all-atom force field each lead to improvements in the recovery rates at higher resolutions. Overall, ConfGen is at least as good as competing programs at high resolution and demonstrates higher efficiency at resolutions sufficient for many downstream applications, such as pharmacophore modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Self-citation
Cited by
Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide
Tubert-Brohman, I., Sherman, W., Repasky, M., & Beuming, T. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400128m · Cited by 1,308
Self-citationCREST—A program for the exploration of low-energy molecular chemical space
Pracht, P., Grimme, S., Bannwarth, C., Bohle, F., Ehlert, S., Feldmann, G., Gorges, J., Müller, M., Neudecker, T., Plett, C., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0197592 · Cited by 574
Docking Covalent Inhibitors: A Parameter Free Approach To Pose Prediction and Scoring
Zhu, K., Borrelli, K. W., Greenwood, J. R., Day, T., Abel, R., Farid, R. S., & Harder, E. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500118s · Cited by 462
Snapshots and ensembles of BTK and cIAP1 protein degrader ternary complexes
Schiemer, J., Horst, R., Meng, Y., Montgomery, J. I., Xu, Y., Feng, X., Borzilleri, K., Uccello, D. P., Leverett, C., Brown, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-020-00686-2 · Cited by 113
Simoben, C., Robaa, D., Chakrabarti, A., Schmidtkunz, K., Marek, M., Lancelot, J., Kannan, S., Melesina, J., Shaik, T., Pierce, R., et al. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23030566 · Cited by 44
Erdogan, A., Ozhan, Y., Sipahi, H., Gurdal, E. E., Sippl, W., & Koksal, M. (2024) · Archiv der Pharmazie · doi:10.1002/ardp.202400238 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Watts, K. S., Dalal, P., Murphy, R. B., Sherman, W., Friesner, R. A., & Shelley, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-04-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 534-546
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W1995850373
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.