Cited by 44Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchComputational Drug Discovery MethodsParasites and Host Interactions

A Novel Class of Schistosoma mansoni Histone Deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) Inhibitors Identified by Structure-Based Virtual Screening and In Vitro Testing

Open access
Simoben, Conrad, Robaa, Dina, Chakrabarti, Alokta, Schmidtkunz, Karin, Marek, Martin, Lancelot, Julien, Kannan, Srinivasaraghavan, Melesina, Jelena +5 more·2018·Molecules

Abstract

A promising means in the search of new small molecules for the treatment of schistosomiasis (amongst other parasitic ailments) is by targeting the parasitic epigenome. In the present study, a docking based virtual screening procedure using the crystal structure of histone deacetylase 8 from Schistosoma mansoni (smHDAC8) was designed. From the developed screening protocol, we were able to identify eight novel N-(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-yl)-n-alkylhydroxamate derivatives as smHDAC8 inhibitors with IC50 values ranging from 4.4–20.3 µM against smHDAC8. These newly identified inhibitors were further tested against human histone deacetylases (hsHDAC1, 6 and 8), and were found also to be exerting interesting activity against them. In silico prediction of the docking pose of the compounds was confirmed by the resolved crystal structure of one of the identified hits. This confirmed these compounds were able to chelate the catalytic zinc ion in a bidentate fashion, whilst showing an inverted binding mode of the hydroxamate group when compared to the reported smHDAC8/hydroxamates crystal structures. Therefore, they can be considered as new potential scaffold for the development of new smHDAC8 inhibitors by further investigation of their structure–activity relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules23030566

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • smHDAC8 crystals can be used to look at inhibitor binding in a crystal lattice-unbiased manner.

    “We have previously shown that our smHDAC8 crystals can be used to look at inhibitor binding in a crystal latticeunbiased manner 29, 30, 55-58 .”

    From Characterization of Histone Deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) Selective Inhibition Reveals Specific Active Site Structural and Functional Determinants (2018) · cites this paper as [57]

    Section 2.2 (page unavailable) reports an smHDAC8–J1036 crystal structure and describes the inhibitor’s binding in the active-site pocket. Section 3.4 (page unavailable) describes soaking smHDAC8 crystals with J1036. Neither section establishes that the observed binding is unbiased by crystal-lattice contacts. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. [1]Gray D.J. Ross A.G. Li Y.S. McManus D.P. Diagnosis and management of schistosomiasis BMJ 2011 342 d2651 10.1136/bmj.d2651 21586478 PMC3230106 · DOI
  2. [2]Hotez P.J. Kamath A. Neglected tropical diseases in sub-saharan Africa: Review of their prevalence, distribution, and disease burden PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009 3 e412 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000412 19707588 PMC2727001 · DOI
  3. [4]Gryseels B. Polman K. Clerinx J. Kestens L. Human schistosomiasis Lancet 2006 368 1106 1118 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3 16997665 · DOI
  4. [5]Colley D.G. Bustinduy A.L. Secor W.E. King C.H. Human schistosomiasis Lancet 2014 383 2253 2264 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2 24698483 PMC4672382 · DOI
  5. [6]Siqueira L.D.P. Fontes D.A.F. Aguilera C.S.B. Timoteo T.R.R. Angelos M.A. Silva L. de Melo C.G. Rolim L.A. da Silva R.M.F. Neto P.J.R. Schistosomiasis: Drugs used and treatment strategies Acta Trop. 2017 176 179 187 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.08.002 28803725 · DOI
  6. [7]Cioli D. Pica-Mattoccia L. Basso A. Guidi A. Schistosomiasis control: Praziquantel forever? Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2014 195 23 29 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.06.002 24955523 · DOI
  7. [8]Othman A.A. Soliman R.H. Schistosomiasis in Egypt: A never-ending story? Acta Trop. 2015 148 179 190 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.04.016 25959770 · DOI
  8. [9]Cioli D. Pica-Mattoccia L. Praziquantel Parasitol. Res. 2003 90 Suppl. 1 S3 S9 12811543
  9. [10]Doenhoff M.J. Cioli D. Utzinger J. Praziquantel: Mechanisms of action, resistance and new derivatives for schistosomiasis Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2008 21 659 667 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328318978f 18978535 · DOI
  10. [11]Doenhoff M.J. Pica-Mattoccia L. Praziquantel for the treatment of schistosomiasis: Its use for control in areas with endemic disease and prospects for drug resistance Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2006 4 199 210 10.1586/14787210.4.2.199 16597202 · DOI
  11. [12]Danso-Appiah A. De Vlas S.J. Interpreting low praziquantel cure rates of Schistosoma mansoni infections in Senegal Trends Parasitol. 2002 18 125 129 10.1016/S1471-4922(01)02209-7 11854090 · DOI
  12. [13]Lawn S.D. Lucas S.B. Chiodini P.L. Case report: Schistosoma mansoni infection: Failure of standard treatment with praziquantel in a returned traveller Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2003 97 100 101 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90038-1 12886814 · DOI
  13. [14]Melman S.D. Steinauer M.L. Cunningham C. Kubatko L.S. Mwangi I.N. Wynn N.B. Mutuku M.W. Karanja D.M. Colley D.G. Black C.L. Reduced susceptibility to praziquantel among naturally occurring Kenyan isolates of Schistosoma mansoni PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009 3 e504 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000504 19688043 PMC2721635 · DOI
  14. [15]Bonesso-Sabadini P.I. de Souza Dias L.C. Altered response of strain of Schistosoma mansoni to oxamniquine and praziquantel Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2002 97 381 385 10.1590/S0074-02762002000300019 12048569 · DOI
  15. [16]Couto F.F. Coelho P.M. Araujo N. Kusel J.R. Katz N. Jannotti-Passos L.K. Mattos A.C. Schistosoma mansoni: A method for inducing resistance to praziquantel using infected Biomphalaria glabrata snails Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2011 106 153 157 10.1590/S0074-02762011000200006 21537673 · DOI
  16. [17]Fallon P.G. Doenhoff M.J. Drug-resistant schistosomiasis: Resistance to praziquantel and oxamniquine induced in Schistosoma mansoni in mice is drug specific Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1994 51 83 88 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.51.83 8059919 · DOI
  17. [18]Ismail M.M. Taha S.A. Farghaly A.M. el-Azony A.S. Laboratory induced resistance to praziquantel in experimental schistosomiasis J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 1994 24 685 695 7844435
  18. [19]Hailu G.S. Robaa D. Forgione M. Sippl W. Rotili D. Mai A. Lysine deacetylase inhibitors in parasites: Past, present, and future perspectives J. Med. Chem. 2017 60 4780 4804 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01595 28241112 · DOI
  19. [20]Jeffers V. Yang C. Huang S. Sullivan W.J. Jr. Bromodomains in protozoan parasites: Evolution, function, and opportunities for drug development Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017 81 10.1128/MMBR.00047-16 28077462 PMC5312238 · DOI
  20. [21]Oger F. Dubois F. Caby S. Noel C. Cornette J. Bertin B. Capron M. Pierce R.J. The class I histone deacetylases of the platyhelminth parasite Schistosoma mansoni Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008 377 1079 1084 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.090 18977200 · DOI
  21. [22]Azzi A. Cosseau C. Grunau C. Schistosoma mansoni: Developmental arrest of miracidia treated with histone deacetylase inhibitors Exp. Parasitol. 2009 121 288 291 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.11.010 19094990 · DOI
  22. [23]Dubois F. Caby S. Oger F. Cosseau C. Capron M. Grunau C. Dissous C. Pierce R.J. Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce apoptosis, histone hyperacetylation and up-regulation of gene transcription in Schistosoma mansoni Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2009 168 7 15 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.06.001 19538992 · DOI
  23. [25]Nakagawa M. Oda Y. Eguchi T. Aishima S. Yao T. Hosoi F. Basaki Y. Ono M. Kuwano M. Tanaka M. Expression profile of class I histone deacetylases in human cancer tissues Oncol. Rep. 2007 18 769 774 10.3892/or.18.4.769 17786334 · DOI
  24. [26]Maolanon A.R. Madsen A.S. Olsen C.A. Innovative strategies for selective inhibition of histone deacetylases Cell Chem. Biol. 2016 23 759 768 10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.06.011 27447046 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [27]Micelli C. Rastelli G. Histone deacetylases: Structural determinants of inhibitor selectivity Drug Discov. Today 2015 20 718 735 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.01.007 25687212 · DOI
  26. [31]Shen S. Kozikowski A.P. Why hydroxamates may not be the best histone deacetylase inhibitors—What some may have forgotten or would rather forget? ChemMedChem 2016 11 15 21 10.1002/cmdc.201500486 26603496 PMC4765907 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [34]Kannan S. Melesina J. Hauser A.T. Chakrabarti A. Heimburg T. Schmidtkunz K. Walter A. Marek M. Pierce R.J. Romier C. Discovery of inhibitors of Schistosoma mansoni HDAC8 by combining homology modeling, virtual screening, and in vitro validation J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014 54 3005 3019 10.1021/ci5004653 25243797 · DOI
  28. [35]Heimburg T. Chakrabarti A. Lancelot J. Marek M. Melesina J. Hauser A.T. Shaik T.B. Duclaud S. Robaa D. Erdmann F. Structure-based design and synthesis of novel inhibitors targeting HDAC8 from Schistosoma mansoni for the treatment of schistosomiasis J. Med. Chem. 2016 59 2423 2435 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01478 26937828 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [36]Suzuki T. Nagano Y. Kouketsu A. Matsuura A. Maruyama S. Kurotaki M. Nakagawa H. Miyata N. Novel inhibitors of human histone deacetylases: Design, synthesis, enzyme inhibition, and cancer cell growth inhibition of SAHA-based non-hydroxamates J. Med. Chem. 2005 48 1019 1032 10.1021/jm049207j 15715470 · DOI
  30. [37]Kleinschek A. Meyners C. Digiorgio E. Brancolini C. Meyer-Almes F.J. Potent and selective non-hydroxamate histone deacetylase 8 inhibitors ChemMedChem 2016 11 2598 2606 10.1002/cmdc.201600528 27860422 · DOI
  31. [38]Suzuki T. Miyata N. Non-hydroxamate histone deacetylase inhibitors Curr. Med. Chem. 2005 12 2867 2880 10.2174/092986705774454706 16305476 · DOI
  32. [39]Heltweg B. Dequiedt F. Marshall B.L. Brauch C. Yoshida M. Nishino N. Verdin E. Jung M. Subtype selective substrates for histone deacetylases J. Med. Chem. 2004 47 5235 5243 10.1021/jm0497592 15456267 · DOI
  33. [40]Hildmann C. Wegener D. Riester D. Hempel R. Schober A. Merana J. Giurato L. Guccione S. Nielsen T.K. Ficner R. Substrate and inhibitor specificity of class 1 and class 2 histone deacetylases J. Biotechnol. 2006 124 258 270 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.01.030 16567013 · DOI
  34. [42]Banks J.L. Beard H.S. Cao Y. Cho A.E. Damm W. Farid R. Felts A.K. Halgren T.A. Mainz D.T. Maple J.R. Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT) J. Comput. Chem. 2005 26 1752 1780 10.1002/jcc.20292 16211539 PMC2742605 · DOI
  35. [44]Watts K.S. Dalal P. Murphy R.B. Sherman W. Friesner R.A. Shelley J.C. ConfGen: A conformational search method for efficient generation of bioactive conformers J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 50 534 546 10.1021/ci100015j 20373803 · DOI
  36. [45]Burley S.K. Berman H.M. Christie C. Duarte J.M. Feng Z. Westbrook J. Young J. Zardecki C. RCSB Protein Data Bank: Sustaining a living digital data resource that enables breakthroughs in scientific research and biomedical education Protein Sci. 2018 27 316 330 10.1002/pro.3331 29067736 PMC5734314 · DOI
  37. [48]Sastry G.M. Adzhigirey M. Day T. Annabhimoju R. Sherman W. Protein and ligand preparation: Parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2013 27 221 234 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8 23579614 · DOI
  38. [50]Shelley J.C. Cholleti A. Frye L.L. Greenwood J.R. Timlin M.R. Uchimaya M. Epik: A software program for pKa prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007 21 681 691 10.1007/s10822-007-9133-z 17899391 · DOI
  39. [52]Baell J.B. Holloway G.A. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays J. Med. Chem. 2010 53 2719 2740 10.1021/jm901137j 20131845 · DOI
  40. [54]Friesner R.A. Banks J.L. Murphy R.B. Halgren T.A. Klicic J.J. Mainz D.T. Repasky M.P. Knoll E.H. Shelley M. Perry J.K. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy J. Med. Chem. 2004 47 1739 1749 10.1021/jm0306430 15027865 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [55]Halgren T.A. Murphy R.B. Friesner R.A. Beard H.S. Frye L.L. Pollard W.T. Banks J.L. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening J. Med. Chem. 2004 47 1750 1759 10.1021/jm030644s 15027866 · DOI
  42. [56]Stolfa D.A. Marek M. Lancelot J. Hauser A.T. Walter A. Leproult E. Melesina J. Rumpf T. Wurtz J.M. Cavarelli J. Molecular basis for the antiparasitic activity of a mercaptoacetamide derivative that inhibits histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) from the human pathogen Schistosoma mansoni J. Mol. Biol. 2014 426 3442 3453 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.03.007 24657767 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [57]Otwinowski Z. Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode Methods Enzymol. 1997 276 307 326 27754618
  44. [58]Adams P.D. Afonine P.V. Bunkoczi G. Chen V.B. Davis I.W. Echols N. Headd J.J. Hung L.W. Kapral G.J. Grosse-Kunstleve R.W. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010 66 Pt 2 213 221 10.1107/S0907444909052925 20124702 PMC2815670 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [59]Emsley P. Cowtan K. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004 60 2126 2132 10.1107/S0907444904019158 15572765 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simoben, C., Robaa, D., Chakrabarti, A., Schmidtkunz, K., Marek, M., Lancelot, J., Kannan, S., Melesina, J., Shaik, T., Pierce, R., Romier, C., Jung, M., & Sippl, W.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Sippl, Wolfgang
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-03-02
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
566
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791203388
Cited by
44
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt) (cc-by)
Funders
  • EU FP7 (241865, 602080)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ju-295/13-1, Si-868/13-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
Schistosoma mansoni, HDAC8, HDAC8 inhibitors, schistosomiasis, epigenetic drug targets, hydroxamate derivatives, zinc chelation, structure-based virtual screening, structure-activity relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthelmintics, Binding Sites, Chelating Agents, Histone Deacetylases, Hydroxamic Acids, Protein Binding, Pyrrolidines, Schistosoma mansoni, Structure-Activity Relationship, Zinc, Helminth Proteins, Gene Expression, Apoptosis, Protein Structure, Secondary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review