The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of Cytochrome P450 Inhibitors and Noninhibitors Using Combined Classifiers
Abstract
Adverse side effects of drug-drug interactions induced by human cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition is an important consideration, especially, during the research phase of drug discovery. It is highly desirable to develop computational models that can predict the inhibitive effect of a compound against a specific CYP isoform. In this study, inhibitor predicting models were developed for five major CYP isoforms, namely 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4, using a combined classifier algorithm on a large data set containing more than 24,700 unique compounds, extracted from PubChem. The combined classifiers algorithm is an ensemble of different independent machine learning classifiers including support vector machine, C4.5 decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, and naïve Bayes, fused by a back-propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN). All developed models were validated by 5-fold cross-validation and a diverse validation set composed of about 9000 diverse unique compounds. The range of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the validation sets was 0.764 to 0.815 for CYP1A2, 0.837 to 0.861 for CYP2C9, 0.793 to 0.842 for CYP2C19, 0.839 to 0.886 for CYP2D6, and 0.754 to 0.790 for CYP3A4, respectively, using the new developed combined classifiers. The overall performance of the combined classifiers fused by BP-ANN was superior to that of three classic fusion techniques (Mean, Maximum, and Multiply). The chemical spaces of data sets were explored by multidimensional scaling plots, and the use of applicability domain improved the prediction accuracies of models. In addition, some representative substructure fragments differentiating CYP inhibitors and noninhibitors were characterized by the substructure fragment analysis. These classification models are applicable for virtual screening of the five major CYP isoforms inhibitors or can be used as simple filters of potential chemicals in drug discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications
Lasser, K. E. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.17.2215 · Cited by 1,005
Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints
Willett, P. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.005 · Cited by 849
Cited by
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42717 · Cited by 18,367
Machine-learning approaches in drug discovery: methods and applications
Lavecchia, A. (2015) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.012 · Cited by 784
Lagorce, D., Douguet, D., Miteva, M. A., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46277 · Cited by 266
Myint, K.-Z., Wang, L., Tong, Q., & Xie, X.-Q. (2012) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp300237z · Cited by 139
In silico prediction of chemical genotoxicity using machine learning methods and structural alerts
Fan, D., Yang, H., Li, F., Sun, L., Di, P., Li, W., Tang, Y., & Liu, G. (2018) · Toxicology Research · doi:10.1039/c7tx00259a · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, F., Yu, Y., Shen, J., Yang, L., Li, W., Liu, G., Lee, P. W., & Tang, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-04-14
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 996-1011
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W84368778
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of Cytochrome P450 Inhibitors and Noninhibitors Using Combined Classifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ci200028n
- The paper
- Cheng, F., Yu, Y., Shen, J., Yang, L., Li, W., Liu, G., Lee, P. W., & Tang, Y. (2011). Classification of Cytochrome P450 Inhibitors and Noninhibitors Using Combined Classifiers. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200028n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.