The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Halogen Interactions in Protein–Ligand Complexes: Implications of Halogen Bonding for Rational Drug Design
Abstract
Halogen bonding interactions between halogenated ligands and proteins were examined using the crystal structures deposited to date in the PDB. The data was analyzed as a function of halogen bonding to main chain Lewis bases, viz. oxygen of backbone carbonyl and backbone amide nitrogen. This analysis also examined halogen bonding to side-chain Lewis bases (O, N, and S) and to the electron-rich aromatic amino acids. All interactions were restricted to van der Waals radii with respective atoms. The data reveals that while fluorine and chlorine have strong tendencies favoring interactions with the backbone Lewis bases at glycine, the trend is not restricted to the achiral amino acid backbone for larger halogens. Halogen side-chain interactions are not restricted to amino acids containing O, N, and S as Lewis bases. Electron-rich aromatic amino acids host a high frequency of halogen bonds as does Leu. A closer examination of the latter hydrophobic side chain reveals that the "propensity of interactions" of halogen ligands at this oily residue is an outcome of strong classical halogen bonds with Lewis bases in the vicinity. Finally, an examination of Θ1 (C-X···O and C-X···N) and Θ2 (X···O-Z and X···N-Z) angles reveals that very few ligands adopt classical halogen bonding angles, suggesting that steric and other factors may influence these angles. The data is discussed in the context of ligand design for pharmaceutical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Definition of the halogen bond (IUPAC Recommendations 2013).
Desiraju, G. R., Ho, P. S., Kloo, L., Legon, A. C., Marquardt, R., Metrangolo, P., Politzer, P., Resnati, G., & Rissanen, K. (2013) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rec-12-05-10 · Cited by 1,957
Cited by
A Survey of the Role of Noncovalent Sulfur Interactions in Drug Design
Beno, B. R., Yeung, K.-S., Bartberger, M. D., Pennington, L. D., & Meanwell, N. A. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm501853m · Cited by 772
The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions
Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J., & Frontera, A. (2015) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201500314 · Cited by 710
Structure of mycobacterial ATP synthase bound to the tuberculosis drug bedaquiline
Guo, H., Courbon, G. M., Bueler, S. A., Mai, J., Liu, J., & Rubinstein, J. L. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3004-3 · Cited by 200
Explainable Deep Relational Networks for Predicting Compound-Protein Affinities and Contacts
Karimi, M., Wu, D., Wang, Z., & Shen, Y. (2019) · doi:10.1101/2019.12.28.890103 · Cited by 64
Explainable Deep Relational Networks for Predicting Compound–Protein Affinities and Contacts
Karimi, M., Wu, D., Wang, Z., & Shen, Y. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00866 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Sirimulla, S., Bailey, J. B., Vegesna, R., & Narayan, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-11-13
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2781-2791
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2090157995
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.