The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virtual Exploration of the Chemical Universe up to 11 Atoms of C, N, O, F: Assembly of 26.4 Million Structures (110.9 Million Stereoisomers) and Analysis for New Ring Systems, Stereochemistry, Physicochemical Properties, Compound Classes, and Drug Discovery
Abstract
All molecules of up to 11 atoms of C, N, O, and F possible under consideration of simple valency, chemical stability, and synthetic feasibility rules were generated and collected in a database (GDB). GDB contains 26.4 million molecules (110.9 million stereoisomers), including three- and four-membered rings and triple bonds. By comparison, only 63 857 compounds of up to 11 atoms were found in public databases (a combination of PubChem, ChemACX, ChemSCX, NCI open database, and the Merck Index). A total of 538 of the 1208 ring systems in GDB are currently unknown in the CAS Registry and Beilstein databases in any carbon/heteroatom/multiple-bond combination or as a substructure. Over 70% of GDB molecules are chiral. Because of their small size, all compounds obey Lipinski's bioavailability rule. A total of 13.2 million compounds also follow Congreve's "Rule of 3" for lead-likeness. A Kohonen map trained with autocorrelation descriptors organizes GDB according to compound classes and shows that leadlike compounds are most abundant in chiral regions of fused carbocycles and fused heterocycles. The projection of known compounds into this map indicates large uncharted areas of chemical space. The potential of GDB for drug discovery is illustrated by virtual screening for kinase inhibitors, G-protein coupled receptor ligands, and ion-channel modulators. The database is available from the author's Web page.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Diversity-oriented synthesis: Exploring the intersections between chemistry and biology
Tan, D. S. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio0705-74 · Cited by 605
Cited by
Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 · Cited by 2,312
ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost
Smith, J. S., Isayev, O., & Roitberg, A. E. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc05720a · Cited by 1,921
Enumeration of 166 Billion Organic Small Molecules in the Chemical Universe Database GDB-17
Ruddigkeit, L., van Deursen, R., Blum, L. C., & Reymond, J.-L. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300415d · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationImpact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research
Macarron, R., Banks, M. N., Bojanic, D., Burns, D. J., Cirovic, D. A., Garyantes, T., Green, D. V. S., Hertzberg, R. P., Janzen, W. P., Paslay, J. W., et al. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3368 · Cited by 1,364
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Hansen, K., Biegler, F., Ramakrishnan, R., Pronobis, W., von Lilienfeld, O. A., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00831 · Cited by 815
Less is more: Sampling chemical space with active learning
Smith, J. S., Nebgen, B., Lubbers, N., Isayev, O., & Roitberg, A. E. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5023802 · Cited by 811
Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space
De, S., Bartók, A. P., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp00415f · Cited by 778
Reymond, J.-L. (2015) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar500432k · Cited by 720
Self-citationKey Topics in Molecular Docking for Drug Design
Torres, P. H. M., Sodero, A. C. R., Jofily, P., & Silva-Jr, F. P. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20184574 · Cited by 641
Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space
Montavon, G., Rupp, M., Gobre, V., Vazquez-Mayagoitia, A., Hansen, K., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & Anatole von Lilienfeld, O. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095003 · Cited by 623
A Critical Review of Machine Learning of Energy Materials
Chen, C., Zuo, Y., Ye, W., Li, X., Deng, Z., & Ong, S. P. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903242 · Cited by 609
Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies
Faber, F., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A., & Armiento, R. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24917 · Cited by 462
Fragment-Based Approaches in Drug Discovery and Chemical Biology
Scott, D. E., Coyne, A. G., Hudson, S. A., & Abell, C. (2012) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi3005126 · Cited by 460
Extending the Applicability of the ANI Deep Learning Molecular Potential to Sulfur and Halogens
Devereux, C., Smith, J. S., Huddleston, K. K., Barros, K., Zubatyuk, R., Isayev, O., & Roitberg, A. E. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00121 · Cited by 441
Exploring chemical compound space with quantum-based machine learning
von Lilienfeld, O. A., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-020-0189-9 · Cited by 369
Heteroaromatic Rings of the Future
Pitt, W. R., Parry, D. M., Perry, B. G., & Groom, C. R. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm801513z · Cited by 332
Virshup, A. M., Contreras-García, J., Wipf, P., Yang, W., & Beratan, D. N. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja401184g · Cited by 294
Ligand efficiency and fragment-based drug discovery
Bembenek, S. D., Tounge, B. A., & Reynolds, C. H. (2009) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.007 · Cited by 196
High-throughput organ-on-a-chip systems: Current status and remaining challenges
Probst, C., Schneider, S., & Loskill, P. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cobme.2018.02.004 · Cited by 171
Fragment-Based Lead Discovery and Design
Joseph-McCarthy, D., Campbell, A. J., Kern, G., & Moustakas, D. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci400731w · Cited by 129
PANNA: Properties from Artificial Neural Network Architectures
Lot, R., Pellegrini, F., Shaidu, Y., & Küçükbenli, E. (2020) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107402 · Cited by 64
Machine learning in materials design: Algorithm and application*
Song, Z., Chen, X., Meng, F., Cheng, G., Wang, C., Sun, Z., & Yin, W.-J. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abc0e3 · Cited by 63
Emergence of homochirality in large molecular systems
Laurent, G., Lacoste, D., & Gaspard, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2012741118 · Cited by 55
Exploring astrobiology using in silico molecular structure generation
Meringer, M., & Cleaves, H. J. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0344 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, T., & Reymond, J.-L.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-01-30
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 342-353
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2206840988
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
