Cited by 815Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: Accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space

Open access
Hansen, Katja, Biegler, Franziska, Ramakrishnan, Raghunathan, Pronobis, Wiktor, von Lilienfeld, O. Anatole, Müller, Klaus-Robert, Tkatchenko, Alexandre·2015·The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Abstract

Simultaneously accurate and efficient prediction of molecular properties throughout chemical compound space is a critical ingredient toward rational compound design in chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Aiming toward this goal, we develop and apply a systematic hierarchy of efficient empirical methods to estimate atomization and total energies of molecules. These methods range from a simple sum over atoms, to addition of bond energies, to pairwise interatomic force fields, reaching to the more sophisticated machine learning approaches that are capable of describing collective interactions between many atoms or bonds. In the case of equilibrium molecular geometries, even simple pairwise force fields demonstrate prediction accuracy comparable to benchmark energies calculated using density functional theory with hybrid exchange-correlation functionals; however, accounting for the collective many-body interactions proves to be essential for approaching the “holy grail” of chemical accuracy of 1 kcal/mol for both equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium geometries. This remarkable accuracy is achieved by a vectorized representation of molecules (so-called Bag of Bonds model) that exhibits strong nonlocality in chemical space. In addition, the same representation allows us to predict accurate electronic properties of molecules, such as their polarizability and molecular frontier orbital energies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00831

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A deep learning algorithm trained on a dataset of known drug compounds and their biological activity was able to predict the activity of novel compounds with high accuracy.

    “For instance, a DL algorithm has recently been trained using a dataset of known drug compounds, along with their corresponding biological activity [11]. The algorithm was then able to predict the activity of novel compounds with high accuracy.”
  • AI algorithms including supervised and unsupervised learning, reinforcement, and evolutionary or rule-based algorithms can potentially contribute to solving problems of current medicinal chemistry methods.

    “Different algorithms based on AI, including supervised and unsupervised learning methods, reinforcement, and evolutionary or rule-based algorithms, can potentially contribute to solving these problems.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lynch B. J.; Truhlar D. G. Robust and Affordable Multicoefficient Methods for Thermochemistry and Thermochemical. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3898.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, K., Biegler, F., Ramakrishnan, R., Pronobis, W., von Lilienfeld, O. A., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A.
Affiliations
  • Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Basel , , Klingelbergstrasse 80 , ,
  • Technical University of Berlin , , Marchstr. 23 , ,
Corresponding author
Tkatchenko, Alexandre
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2015-06-04
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
2326-2331
ISSN
1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1531674615
Cited by
815
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NA)
  • European Research Council (VDW-CMAT)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MU 987/20)
  • Schweizerische Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PP00P2_138932)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NA)
  • Einstein Foundation Berlin (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
molecular property prediction, atomization energies, total energy, many-body interactions, interatomic force field, molecular geometry, polarizability, frontier orbital energies
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Ethanol, Models, Chemical, Quantum Theory, Thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review