Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure

Wessel, Matthew D., Jurs, Peter C., Tolan, John W., Muskal, Steven M.·1998·Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Abstract

The absorption of a drug compound through the human intestinal cell lining is an important property for potential drug candidates. Measuring this property, however, can be costly and time-consuming. The use of quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs) to estimate percent human intestinal absorption (%HIA) is an attractive alternative to experimental measurements. A data set of 86 drug and drug-like compounds with measured values of %HIA taken from the literature was used to develop and test a QSPR mode. The compounds were encoded with calculated molecular structure descriptors. A nonlinear computational neural network model was developed by using the genetic algorithm with a neural network fitness evaluator. The calculated %HIA (cHIA) model performs wells, with root-mean-square (rms) errors of 9.4%HIA units for the training set, 19.7%HIA units for the cross-validation (CV) set, and 16.0%HIA units for the external prediction set.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci980029a

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wessel, M. D., Jurs, P. C., Tolan, J. W., & Muskal, S. M.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
Published
1998-06-19
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
726-735
ISSN
  • 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5142
OpenAlex
W2003873735
Cited by
365
References
6
FWCI
29.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.