Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chemical Similarity Assessment through Multilevel Neighborhoods of Atoms: Definition and Comparison with the Other Descriptors

Filimonov, Dmitrii, Poroikov, Vladimir, Borodina, Yulia, Gloriozova, Tatyana·1999·Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Abstract

A new method for assessment of molecular similarity based on original description of chemical structure is discussed. The accuracy of similarity assessment obtained with this method is compared with that of the results of four other approaches. The same evaluation set is used to predict: (a) boiling point of 139 hydrocarbons and (b) mutagenicity of 15 nitrosamines. The results show that the proposed method provides reasonable appraisal for both properties, but prediction of mutagenicity is more accurate in this method as compared to the alternatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci980335o

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Filimonov, D., Poroikov, V., Borodina, Y., & Gloriozova, T.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
Published
1999-06-10
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
666-670
ISSN
0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099195105
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.