The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical Windows of Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids from Molecular Dynamics and Density Functional Theory Calculations
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the cathodic and anodic limits of six room-temperature ionic liquids (ILs) formed from a combination of two common cations, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium (BMIM) and N, N -propylmethylpyrrolidinium (P13), and three common anions, PF 6, BF 4, and bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (TFSI), using an approach that combines molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. All interion interactions were taken into account by explicitly modeling the entire liquid structure using classical MD, followed by DFT computations of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies. The relative cathodic and anodic limits of BMIM PF 6, BMIM BF 4, BMIM TFSI, and P13 TFSI obtained from our approach are in fairly good agreement with existing experimental data. From our DFT calculations, we also obtained the cation- and anion-projected density of states (DOS), which provide information on the likely species contributing to reductive and oxidative decomposition. Our predictions support Howlett et al.’s earlier finding (1) that the TFSI anion is less stable than the P13 cation against reduction. In addition, our results provide surprising evidence of possible cation anodic instability; we predict the aromatic BMIM cation to be less stable against oxidation than the respective anions in BMIM PF 6 and BMIM BF 4, and the P13 cation to be less stable against oxidation than the PF 6 anion in P13 PF 6 . We also present a comparison of the predictions of our approach with that of simpler approximations based on in vacuo or polarizable continuum model calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods
Martin, R. M. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805769 · Cited by 1,752
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Ong, S. P., Mo, Y., Richards, W. D., Miara, L., Lee, H. S., & Ceder, G. (2013) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c2ee23355j · Cited by 710
Self-citationBorodin, O., Behl, W., & Jow, T. R. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp400527c · Cited by 365
Karnan, M., Subramani, K., Srividhya, P. K., & Sathish, M. (2017) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.095 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, S. P., Andreussi, O., Wu, Y., Marzari, N., & Ceder, G.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2979-2986
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2132701358
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical Windows of Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids from Molecular Dynamics and Density Functional Theory Calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm200679y
- The paper
- Ong, S. P., Andreussi, O., Wu, Y., Marzari, N., & Ceder, G. (2011). Electrochemical Windows of Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids from Molecular Dynamics and Density Functional Theory Calculations. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm200679y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.