The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase stability, electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12(M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or Se) family of superionic conductors
Abstract
We present an investigation of the phase stability, electrochemical stability and Li+ conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12 (M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or Se) family of superionic conductors using first principles calculations. The Li10GeP2S12 (LGPS) superionic conductor has the highest Li+ conductivity reported to date, with excellent electrochemical performance demonstrated in a Li-ion rechargeable battery. Our results show that isovalent cation substitutions of Ge4+ have a small effect on the relevant intrinsic properties, with Li10SiP2S12 and Li10SnP2S12 having similar phase stability, electrochemical stability and Li+ conductivity as LGPS. Aliovalent cation substitutions (M = Al or P) with compensating changes in the Li+ concentration also have a small effect on the Li+ conductivity in this structure. Anion substitutions, however, have a much larger effect on these properties. The oxygen-substituted Li10MP2O12 compounds are predicted not to be stable (with equilibrium decomposition energies >90 meV per atom) and have much lower Li+ conductivities than their sulfide counterparts. The selenium-substituted Li10MP2Se12 compounds, on the other hand, show a marginal improvement in conductivity, but at the expense of reduced electrochemical stability. We also studied the effect of lattice parameter changes on the Li+ conductivity and found the same asymmetry in behavior between increases and decreases in the lattice parameters, i.e., decreases in the lattice parameters lower the Li+ conductivity significantly, while increases in the lattice parameters increase the Li+ conductivity only marginally. Based on these results, we conclude that the size of the S2− is near optimal for Li+ conduction in this structural framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions
Hoover, W. G. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.31.1695 · Cited by 23,465
Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential
Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E., & Ernzerhof, M. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1564060 · Cited by 19,629
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods
Nosé, S. (1984) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.447334 · Cited by 19,152
Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations
Perdew, J. P., Ernzerhof, M., & Burke, K. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.472933 · Cited by 6,629
Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale
Ewald, P. P. (1921) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19213690304 · Cited by 6,013
Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E., & Ernzerhof, M. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2204597 · Cited by 5,288
Cited by
Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis
Ong, S. P., Richards, W. D., Jain, A., Hautier, G., Kocher, M., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Chevrier, V. L., Persson, K. A., & Ceder, G. (2013) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 · Cited by 4,534
Self-citationInterface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Self-citationScaling deep learning for materials discovery
Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S. S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G., & Cubuk, E. D. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 · Cited by 1,527
Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
Wenzel, S., Randau, S., Leichtweiß, T., Weber, D. A., Sann, J., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00610 · Cited by 854
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, S. P., Mo, Y., Richards, W. D., Miara, L., Lee, H. S., & Ceder, G.
- Venue
- Energy Environ. Sci.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-156
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2096694960
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase stability, electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12(M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or Se) family of superionic conductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ee23355j
- The paper
- Ong, S. P., Mo, Y., Richards, W. D., Miara, L., Lee, H. S., & Ceder, G. (2013). Phase stability, electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12(M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or Se) family of superionic conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee23355j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.