The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Force Field and a Surface Model Database for Silica to Simulate Interfacial Properties in Atomic Resolution
Abstract
Silica nanostructures find applications in drug delivery, catalysis, and composites, however, understanding of the surface chemistry, aqueous interfaces, and biomolecule recognition remain difficult using current imaging techniques and spectroscopy. A silica force field is introduced that resolves numerous shortcomings of prior silica force fields over the last 30 years and reduces uncertainties in computed interfacial properties relative to experiment from several 100% to less than 5%. In addition, a silica surface model database is introduced for the full range of variable surface chemistry and pH (Q 2, Q 3, Q 4 environments with adjustable degree of ionization) that have shown to determine selective molecular recognition. The force field enables accurate computational predictions of aqueous interfacial properties of all types of silica, which is substantiated by extensive comparisons to experimental measurements. The parameters are integrated into multiple force fields for broad applicability to biomolecules, polymers, and inorganic materials (AMBER, CHARMM, COMPASS, CVFF, PCFF, INTERFACE force fields). We also explain mechanistic details of molecular adsorption of water vapor, as well as significant variations in the amount and dissociation depth of superficial cations at silica–water interfaces that correlate with ζ-potential measurements and create a wide range of aqueous environments for adsorption and self-assembly of complex molecules. The systematic analysis of binding conformations and adsorption free energies of distinct peptides to silica surfaces will be reported separately in a companion paper. The models aid to understand and design silica nanomaterials in 3D atomic resolution and are extendable to chemical reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery and biosensing applications
Slowing, I. I., Trewyn, B. G., Giri, S., & Lin, V. S. ‐. (2007) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.200601191 · Cited by 1,699
Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D: structure, function and receptors
Kishore, U., Greenhough, T. J., Waters, P., Shrive, A. K., Ghai, R., Kamran, M. F., Bernal, A. L., Reid, K. B. M., Madan, T., & Chakraborty, T. (2006) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2005.08.004 · Cited by 523
Cited by
Effect of Ions on H-Bond Structure and Dynamics at the Quartz(101)–Water Interface
DelloStritto, M. J., Kubicki, J. D., & Sofo, J. O. (2016) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01719 · Cited by 55
Manning, J. R. H., Yip, T. W. S., Centi, A., Jorge, M., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2017) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201700027 · Cited by 29
Self-citationSong, X., Man, J., Ji, M., Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Li, J. (2026) · Surfaces and Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2026.109046
Metadata
- Authors
- Emami, F. S., Puddu, V., Berry, R. J., Varshney, V., Patwardhan, S. V., Perry, C. C., & Heinz, H.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2647-2658
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2004167300
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.