The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Approach
Abstract
Physico–chemical characterization of nanoparticles in the context of their transport and fate in the environment is an important challenge for risk assessment of nanomaterials. One of the main characteristics that defines the behavior of nanoparticles in solution is zeta potential (ζ). In this paper, we have demonstrated the relationship between zeta potential and a series of intrinsic physico–chemical features of 15 metal oxide nanoparticles revealed by computational study. The here-developed quantitative structure–property relationship model (nano-QSPR) was able to predict the ζ of metal oxide nanoparticles utilizing only two descriptors: (i) the spherical size of nanoparticles, a parameter from numerical analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, and (ii) the energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital per metal atom, a theoretical descriptor calculated by quantum mechanics at semiempirical level of theory (PM6 method). The obtained consensus model is characterized by reasonably good predictivity ( Q EXT 2 = 0.87). Therefore, the developed model can be utilized for in silico evaluation of properties of novel engineered nanoparticles. This study is a first step in developing a comprehensive and computationally based system to predict physico–chemical properties that are responsible for aggregation phenomena in metal oxide nanoparticles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials
Dobrovolskaia, M. A., & McNeil, S. E. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.223 · Cited by 1,823
Jiang, J., Oberdörster, G., & Biswas, P. (2009) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 · Cited by 1,713
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779
Cited by
Employing Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks for Voltammetric Detection of Neurochemicals
Ko, M., Mendecki, L., Eagleton, A. M., Durbin, C. G., Stolz, R. M., Meng, Z., & Mirica, K. A. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13402 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikolajczyk, A., Gajewicz, A., Rasulev, B., Schaeublin, N., Maurer-Gardner, E., Hussain, S., Leszczynski, J., & Puzyn, T.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-03-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2400-2407
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2312593782
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm504406a
- The paper
- Mikolajczyk, A., Gajewicz, A., Rasulev, B., Schaeublin, N., Maurer-Gardner, E., Hussain, S., Leszczynski, J., & Puzyn, T. (2015). Zeta Potential for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Predictive Model Developed by a Nano-Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Approach. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm504406a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
