The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Li−Fe−P−O2 Phase Diagram from First Principles Calculations
Abstract
We present an efficient way to calculate the phase diagram of the quaternary Li−Fe−P−O 2 system using ab initio methods. The ground-state energies of all known compounds in the Li−Fe−P−O 2 system were calculated using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) approximation to density functional theory (DFT) and the DFT+U extension to it. Considering only the entropy of gaseous phases, the phase diagram was constructed as a function of oxidation conditions, with the oxygen chemical potential, μ O 2, capturing both temperature and oxygen partial pressure dependence. A modified Ellingham diagram was also developed by incorporating the experimental entropy data of gaseous phases. The phase diagram shows LiFePO 4 to be stable over a wide range of oxidation environments, being the first Fe 2+ -containing phase to appear upon reduction at μ O 2 = −11.52 eV and the last of the Fe-containing phosphates to be reduced at μ O 2 = −16.74 eV. Lower μ O 2 represents more reducing conditions, which generally correspond to higher temperatures and/or lower oxygen partial pressures and/or the presence of reducing agents. The predicted phase relations and reduction conditions compare well to experimental findings on stoichiometric and Li-off-stoichiometric LiFePO 4 . For Li-deficient stoichiometries, the formation of iron phosphate phases (Fe 7 (PO 4 ) 6 and Fe 2 P 2 O 7 ) commonly observed under moderately reducing conditions during LiFePO 4 synthesis and the formation of iron phosphides (Fe 2 P) under highly reducing conditions are consistent with the predictions from our phase diagram. Our diagrams also predict the formation of Li 3 PO 4 and iron oxides for Li-excess stoichiometries under all but the most reducing conditions, again in agreement with experimental observations. For stoichiometric LiFePO 4, the phase diagram gives the correct oxidation products of Li 3 Fe 2 (PO 4 ) 3 and Fe 2 O 3 . The predicted carbothermal reduction temperatures for LiFePO 4 from the Ellingham diagram are also within the range observed in experiments (800–900 °C). The diagrams developed provide a better understanding of phase relations within the Li−Fe−P−O 2 system and serve as a guide for future experimental efforts in materials processing, in particular, for the optimization of synthesis routes for LiFePO 4 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Cited by
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Self-citationPython Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis
Ong, S. P., Richards, W. D., Jain, A., Hautier, G., Kocher, M., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Chevrier, V. L., Persson, K. A., & Ceder, G. (2013) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 · Cited by 4,534
Self-citationInterface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Self-citationInterfaces and Interphases in All-Solid-State Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes
Banerjee, A., Wang, X., Fang, C., Wu, E. A., & Meng, Y. S. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 · Cited by 1,526
Zhu, Y., He, X., & Mo, Y. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta08574h · Cited by 1,045
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, S. P., Wang, L., Kang, B., & Ceder, G.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1798-1807
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2027184266
- Cited by
- 814
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.