Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 814

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Li−Fe−P−O2 Phase Diagram from First Principles Calculations

Ong, Shyue Ping, Wang, Lei, Kang, Byoungwoo, Ceder, Gerbrand·2008·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

We present an efficient way to calculate the phase diagram of the quaternary Li−Fe−P−O 2 system using ab initio methods. The ground-state energies of all known compounds in the Li−Fe−P−O 2 system were calculated using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) approximation to density functional theory (DFT) and the DFT+U extension to it. Considering only the entropy of gaseous phases, the phase diagram was constructed as a function of oxidation conditions, with the oxygen chemical potential, μ O 2, capturing both temperature and oxygen partial pressure dependence. A modified Ellingham diagram was also developed by incorporating the experimental entropy data of gaseous phases. The phase diagram shows LiFePO 4 to be stable over a wide range of oxidation environments, being the first Fe 2+ -containing phase to appear upon reduction at μ O 2 = −11.52 eV and the last of the Fe-containing phosphates to be reduced at μ O 2 = −16.74 eV. Lower μ O 2 represents more reducing conditions, which generally correspond to higher temperatures and/or lower oxygen partial pressures and/or the presence of reducing agents. The predicted phase relations and reduction conditions compare well to experimental findings on stoichiometric and Li-off-stoichiometric LiFePO 4 . For Li-deficient stoichiometries, the formation of iron phosphate phases (Fe 7 (PO 4 ) 6 and Fe 2 P 2 O 7 ) commonly observed under moderately reducing conditions during LiFePO 4 synthesis and the formation of iron phosphides (Fe 2 P) under highly reducing conditions are consistent with the predictions from our phase diagram. Our diagrams also predict the formation of Li 3 PO 4 and iron oxides for Li-excess stoichiometries under all but the most reducing conditions, again in agreement with experimental observations. For stoichiometric LiFePO 4, the phase diagram gives the correct oxidation products of Li 3 Fe 2 (PO 4 ) 3 and Fe 2 O 3 . The predicted carbothermal reduction temperatures for LiFePO 4 from the Ellingham diagram are also within the range observed in experiments (800–900 °C). The diagrams developed provide a better understanding of phase relations within the Li−Fe−P−O 2 system and serve as a guide for future experimental efforts in materials processing, in particular, for the optimization of synthesis routes for LiFePO 4 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm702327g

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 814

Metadata

Authors
Ong, S. P., Wang, L., Kang, B., & Ceder, G.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2008-02-07
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1798-1807
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2027184266
Cited by
814
References
2
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.