Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synthesis and Li-Ion Insertion Properties of Highly Crystalline Mesoporous Rutile TiO2

Wang, Donghai, Choi, Daiwon, Yang, Zhenguo, Viswanathan, Vilayanur V., Nie, Zimin, Wang, Chongmin, Song, Yujiang, Zhang, Ji-Guang, Liu, Jun·2008·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Mesoporous TiO 2 has attracted great attention as a promising Li insertion electrode material with improved cycling life, rate capability, and high power density. Up to date, mesoporous anatase TiO 2 has been investigated for Li insertion. Recent studies have shown that nanosized rutile could be an excellent candidate for anode materials for higher Li insertion capacity and improved stability. However, synthesis of highly crystalline mesoporous rutile has met with limited success so far. There has been no report on Li insertion of mesoporous rutile TiO 2 . In this paper, we report a new low-temperature solution growth of TiO 2 nanocrystals within an anionic surfactant matrix to produce highly crystalline mesoporous rutile and investigate Li insertion properties of the mesoporous crystalline rutile. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and N 2 sorption isotherms reveal that mesoporous structure in the highly crystalline mesoporous TiO 2 directly results from the anionic surfactant templating effects with high surface area (245−300 m 2 /g) and tunable mesopore diameter ranging from 2.2 to 3.8 nm after calcination. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements show that framework of the highly crystalline mesoporous TiO 2 are composed of aligned rutile nanorod building blocks grown along [001] direction. The new mesoporous crystalline rutile can accommodate more than 0.7 Li (Li 0.7 TiO 2, 235 mA h g −1 ) during the first discharge at a C /5 rate between 1 and 3 V versus Li + /Li, with a reversible capacity of 0.55 Li (Li 0.55 TiO 2, 185 mA h g −1 ). The mesoporous crystalline rutile shows excellent capacity retention with less than 10% capacity loss after more than 100 cycles. XRD and TEM characterization on the electrochemically lithiated sample show that the rutile nanorods were transformed into cubic rocksalt LiTiO 2 nanorods, but the mesostructures remained stable after the phase transformation and cycling. Furthermore, the crystalline mesoporous rutile may also have good potential for other applications such as stable catalyst supports.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm8002589

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Wang, D., Choi, D., Yang, Z., Viswanathan, V. V., Nie, Z., Wang, C., Song, Y., Zhang, J.-G., & Liu, J.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
3435-3442
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W1972864792
Cited by
264
References
1
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.