The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Way to Rechargeable Mg Batteries: The Challenge of New Cathode Materials
Abstract
To initiate wider discussion about promising research directions, this paper highlights a number of challenges in the development of rechargeable Mg batteries, especially those related to the slow solid-state Mg diffusion in common hosts. With a focus on the intercalation mechanism, we compare for the first time different strategies proposed in the literature for developing Mg battery cathodes, like the use of (i) nanoscale cathode materials; (ii) hybrid intercalation compounds containing bound water or other additional anion groups that can presumably screen the charge of the inserted cations, (iii) cluster-containing compounds with efficient attainment of local electroneutrality. This comparative analysis shows that cathodes whose function is based on a combination of the two first strategies, e.g., V 2 O 5 gels and their hybrids, can exhibit relatively high voltage and capacity upon Mg insertion, but their kinetics is insufficiently fast. A proper intercalation mechanism for such materials is still unknown, but their relatively slow cation transport seems to be intrinsic: The paradox is that the high capacity testifies Mg insertion into crystal sites with incomplete charge screening. In contrast, the high rate capability and exclusively stable cycling of cathodes based on Chevrel phases (Mo 6 -cluster- containing compounds) are appropriate for Mg battery design, but they offer low energy density because of the low voltage. On the basis of the knowledge of the intercalation mechanism in these phases, we believe that the future search for cathode materials in rechargeable Mg batteries should be focused on new cluster-containing intercalation compounds with higher capacity and working potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Yan, M., He, P., Chen, Y., Wang, S., Wei, Q., Zhao, K., Xu, X., An, Q., Shuang, Y., Shao, Y., et al. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703725 · Cited by 1,456
Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond
Muldoon, J., Bucur, C. B., & Gregory, T. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500049y · Cited by 1,376
Nanostructured Mo-based electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage
Hu, X., Zhang, W., Liu, X., Mei, Y., & Huang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00350k · Cited by 711
Metadata
- Authors
- Levi, E., Gofer, Y., & Aurbach, D.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-08-25
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 860-868
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W1970529682
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.