The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene/Polyaniline Nanofiber Composites as Supercapacitor Electrodes
Abstract
Chemically modified graphene and polyaniline (PANI) nanofiber composites were prepared by in situ polymerization of aniline monomer in the presence of graphene oxide under acid conditions. The obtained graphene oxide/PANI composites with different mass ratios were reduced to graphene using hydrazine followed by reoxidation and reprotonation of the reduced PANI to give the graphene/PANI nanocomposites. The morphology, composition, and electronic structure of the composites together with pure polyaniline fibers ( PANI-F ), graphene oxide ( GO ), and graphene ( GR ) were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), solid-state 13 C NMR, FT-IR, scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that the chemically modified graphene and the PANI nanofibers formed a uniform nanocomposite with the PANI fibers absorbed on the graphene surface and/or filled between the graphene sheets. Such uniform structure together with the observed high conductivities afforded high specific capacitance and good cycling stability during the charge−discharge process when used as supercapacitor electrodes. A specific capacitance of as high as 480 F/g at a current density of 0.1 A/g was achieved over a PANI-doped graphene composite. The research data revealed that high specific capacitance and good cycling stability can be achieved either by doping chemically modified graphenes with PANI or by doping the bulky PANIs with graphene/graphene oxide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1849 · Cited by 39,979
Graphene-based composite materials
Stankovich, S., Dikin, D. A., Dommett, G. H. B., Kohlhaas, K. M., Zimney, E. J., Stach, E. A., Piner, R. D., Nguyen, S. T., & Ruoff, R. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04969 · Cited by 12,922
Nanofiber Formation in the Chemical Polymerization of Aniline: A Mechanistic Study
Huang, J., & Kaner, R. B. (2004) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200460616 · Cited by 756
Cited by
Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites
Kuilla, T., Bhadra, S., Yao, D., Kim, N. H., Bose, S., & Lee, J. H. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 · Cited by 3,406
Ni(OH) 2 Nanoplates Grown on Graphene as Advanced Electrochemical Pseudocapacitor Materials
Wang, H., Casalongue, H. S., Liang, Y., & Dai, H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja102267j · Cited by 2,042
Electrochemistry of Graphene and Related Materials
Ambrosi, A., Chua, C. K., Bonanni, A., & Pumera, M. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500023c · Cited by 1,208
Graphene-polymer nanocomposites for structural and functional applications
Hu, K., Kulkarni, D. D., Choi, I., & Tsukruk, V. V. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.001 · Cited by 1,085
Nanostructured carbon for energy storage and conversion
Candelaria, S. L., Shao, Y., Zhou, W., Li, X., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.-G., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Li, J., & Cao, G. (2012) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.006 · Cited by 975
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, K., Zhang, L. L., Zhao, X. S., & Wu, J.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-01-27
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1392-1401
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2077039392
- Cited by
- 2,234
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 73.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.