Cited by 738Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells

Weber, Adam Z., Newman, John·2004·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

In this review, we have examined the different models for polymer-electrolyte fuel cells operating with hydrogen. The major focus has been on transport of the various species within the fuel cell. The different regions of the fuel cell were examined, and their modeling methodologies and equations were elucidated. In particular, the 1-D fuel-cell sandwich was discussed thoroughly because it is the most important part of the fuel-cell assembly. Models that included other effects such as temperature gradients and transport in other directions besides through the fuel-cell sandwich were also discussed. Models were not directly compared to each other; instead they were broken down into their constitutive parts. The reason for this is that validation of the models is usually accomplished by comparison of simulation to experimental polarization data (e.g., Figure 3). However, other data can also be used such as the net flux of water through the membrane. In fitting these data, the models vary not only in their complexity and treatments but also in their number and kind of fitting parameters. This is one reason it is hard to justify one approach over another by just looking at the modeling results. In general, it seems reasonable that the more complex models, which are based on physical arguments and do not contain many fitting parameters, are perhaps closest to reality. Of course, this assumes that they fit the experimental data and observations. This last point has been overlooked in the validation of many models. For example, a model may fit the data very well for certain operating conditions, but if it does not at least predict the correct trend when one of those conditions is changed, then the model is shown to be valid only within a certain operating range. This review has highlighted the important effects that should be modeled. These include two-phase flow of liquid water and gas in the fuel-cell sandwich, a robust membrane model that accounts for the different membrane transport modes, nonisothermal effects, especially in the directions perpendicular to the sandwich, and multidimensional effects such as changing gas composition along the channel, among others. For any model, a balance must be struck between the complexity required to describe the physical reality and the additional costs of such complexity. In other words, while more complex models more accurately describe the physics of the transport processes, they are more computationally costly and may have so many unknown parameters that their results are not as meaningful. Hopefully, this review has shown and broken down for the reader the vast complexities of transport within polymer-electrolyte fuel cells and the various ways they have been and can be modeled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr020729l

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Weber-Newman theory argues, with support from Janssen, that liquid water content, as distinct from water content dissolved in the membrane, must be modelled explicitly to allow a pressure gradient to drive liquid water flow alongside the chemical potential gradient.

    “The Weber–Newman theory argues with support from Janssen that liquid water content, as distinct from water content dissolved in the membrane, must be modelled explicitly to allow a pressure gradient to drive liquid water flow alongside the chemical potential gradient [9,96];”
  • Since solubility falls with temperature while diffusivity rises, permeability is only weakly dependent on temperature, albeit still positively increasing.

    “Since these effects often have opposing temperature dependences, with solubility falling with temperature while diffusivity rises, permeability is only weakly dependent on temperature, albeit still positively increasing.”
  • The permeation coefficient is a convenient measure due to its combination of the solubility of the gas and the diffusivity of dissolved gas in the membrane into a single empirical quantity.

    “The permeation coefficient is a convenient measure due to its combination of the solubility of the gas and the diffusivity of dissolved gas in the membrane into a single empirical quantity [9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Weber, Adam Z.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2004-08-10
Volume
104
Issue
10
Pages
4679-4726
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2029877130
Cited by
738
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 52
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, hydrogen fuel cells, species transport, two-phase flow, liquid water transport, membrane transport, multidimensional modeling, model validation, polarization data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review