Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Abstract
In this review, we have examined the different models for polymer-electrolyte fuel cells operating with hydrogen. The major focus has been on transport of the various species within the fuel cell. The different regions of the fuel cell were examined, and their modeling methodologies and equations were elucidated. In particular, the 1-D fuel-cell sandwich was discussed thoroughly because it is the most important part of the fuel-cell assembly. Models that included other effects such as temperature gradients and transport in other directions besides through the fuel-cell sandwich were also discussed. Models were not directly compared to each other; instead they were broken down into their constitutive parts. The reason for this is that validation of the models is usually accomplished by comparison of simulation to experimental polarization data (e.g., Figure 3). However, other data can also be used such as the net flux of water through the membrane. In fitting these data, the models vary not only in their complexity and treatments but also in their number and kind of fitting parameters. This is one reason it is hard to justify one approach over another by just looking at the modeling results. In general, it seems reasonable that the more complex models, which are based on physical arguments and do not contain many fitting parameters, are perhaps closest to reality. Of course, this assumes that they fit the experimental data and observations. This last point has been overlooked in the validation of many models. For example, a model may fit the data very well for certain operating conditions, but if it does not at least predict the correct trend when one of those conditions is changed, then the model is shown to be valid only within a certain operating range. This review has highlighted the important effects that should be modeled. These include two-phase flow of liquid water and gas in the fuel-cell sandwich, a robust membrane model that accounts for the different membrane transport modes, nonisothermal effects, especially in the directions perpendicular to the sandwich, and multidimensional effects such as changing gas composition along the channel, among others. For any model, a balance must be struck between the complexity required to describe the physical reality and the additional costs of such complexity. In other words, while more complex models more accurately describe the physics of the transport processes, they are more computationally costly and may have so many unknown parameters that their results are not as meaningful. Hopefully, this review has shown and broken down for the reader the vast complexities of transport within polymer-electrolyte fuel cells and the various ways they have been and can be modeled.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Weber-Newman theory argues, with support from Janssen, that liquid water content, as distinct from water content dissolved in the membrane, must be modelled explicitly to allow a pressure gradient to drive liquid water flow alongside the chemical potential gradient.
“The Weber–Newman theory argues with support from Janssen that liquid water content, as distinct from water content dissolved in the membrane, must be modelled explicitly to allow a pressure gradient to drive liquid water flow alongside the chemical potential gradient [9,96];”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Since solubility falls with temperature while diffusivity rises, permeability is only weakly dependent on temperature, albeit still positively increasing.
“Since these effects often have opposing temperature dependences, with solubility falling with temperature while diffusivity rises, permeability is only weakly dependent on temperature, albeit still positively increasing.”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
The permeation coefficient is a convenient measure due to its combination of the solubility of the gas and the diffusivity of dissolved gas in the membrane into a single empirical quantity.
“The permeation coefficient is a convenient measure due to its combination of the solubility of the gas and the diffusivity of dissolved gas in the membrane into a single empirical quantity [9].”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645 · see citing works
A General Energy Balance for Battery Systems
Bernardi, D., Pawlikowski, E., & Newman, J. (1985) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2113792 · Cited by 2,548 · see citing works
Self-citationKreuer, K.-D., Paddison, S. J., Spohr, E., & Schuster, M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020715f · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
Modeling and Experimental Diagnostics in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Springer, T. E., Wilson, M. S., & Gottesfeld, S. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221120 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1639157 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Self-citationPassalacqua, E., Lufrano, F., Squadrito, G., Patti, A., & Giorgi, L. (2001) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0013-4686(00)00679-4 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1580822 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Self-citationQuasi-3D modeling of water transport in polymer electrolyte fuel cells
Kulikovsky, A. A. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1611489 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
A phenomenological model of water transport in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell
Janssen, G. J. M. (2001) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1415031 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Insights into Perfluorinated Sulfonic-Acid Ionomers
Kusoglu, A., & Weber, A. Z. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 · Cited by 2,432 · see citing works
Self-citationDu, L., Zhang, G., Liu, X., Hassanpour, A., Dubois, M., Tavares, A. C., & Sun, S. (2020) · Carbon Energy · doi:10.1002/cey2.73 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Dickinson, E. J. F., & Smith, G. (2020) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes10110310 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Liu, L., Samjeske, G., Nagamatsu, S.-I., Sekizawa, O., Nagasawa, K., Takao, S., Imaizumi, Y., Yamamoto, T., Uruga, T., & Iwasawa, Y. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp308021a · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Interfacial Water Transport Effects in Proton-Exchange Membranes
Kientiz, B., Yamada, H., Nonoyama, N., & Weber, A. Z. (2011) · Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology · doi:10.1115/1.4002398 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, C., Cheng, X., Yan, X., Shen, S., Ke, C., Wei, G., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0401904jes · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weber, Adam Z.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-08-10
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4679-4726
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2029877130
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 52
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Keywords
- proton exchange membrane fuel cells, hydrogen fuel cells, species transport, two-phase flow, liquid water transport, membrane transport, multidimensional modeling, model validation, polarization data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review