Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 643

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reactivity of Surface Species in Heterogeneous Catalysts Probed by In Situ X-ray Absorption Techniques

Open access
Bordiga, Silvia, Groppo, Elena, Agostini, Giovanni, van Bokhoven, Jeroen A., Lamberti, Carlo·2013·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Experimental Methods 2.1. Materials 2.1.1. Metal-Substituted MFI Frameworks 2.1.2. Cu-Substituted Zeolites 2.1.3. Cr/SiO2 Phillips catalyst 2.1.4. CuCl2/Al2O3 2.1.5. Metal-Supported Catalysts 2.2. Techniques and Experiential Set-ups 2.2.1. X-ray Beam Optimization: Energy Selection 2.2.2. X-ray Beam Optimization: Harmonic Rejection 2.2.3. X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy: Acquisition Setups for Standard and Time-Resolved Experiments 2.2.4. X-ray Emission Spectroscopy: Acquisition Setup 2.2.5. High-Energy Resolution Fluorescence Detected (HERFD) XANES and EXAFS and Range-Extended EXAFS Spectroscopy 2.2.6. In Situ and Operando Cells for Hard and Soft XAFS 2.2.7. Experimental Set-Ups for Micrometer-Resolved Experiments 2.3. EXAFS and XANES Theory and Data Analysis 2.3.1. Brief Historical Overview 2.3.2. Single-Scattering Approximation 2.3.3. Multiple-Scattering Expansion 2.3.4. Codes for EXAFS Data Analysis 2.3.5. Codes for XANES Data Analysis 2.3.6. Codes for XES Spectra Simulation 2.3.7. Codes for Handling the Huge Numbers of Spectra Generated in Time or Space Resolved Experiments 2.3.8. Debye–Waller Factors and Disorder 2.3.9. Differential XAFS Approach 2.4. Atomic XAFS or AXAFS 2.4.1. Brief Historical Overview 2.4.2. Physical Principles of AXAFS 2.5. Other Related Techniques 2.5.1. X-ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism (XMCD) 2.5.2. Diffraction Anomalous Fine Structure (DAFS) 2.5.3. Extended Energy-Loss Fine Structure (EXELFS) 2.5.4. Total scattering: the pair distribution function (PDF) approach 3. Metal Isomorphous Substitution in Zeolitic Frameworks: Ti, Fe, and Ga 3.1. Relevance of Ti-, Fe-, and Ga-Silicalite-1, and B-CHA in the Field of Catalysis 3.2. TS-1 3.2.1. Brief Historical Overview on the Role Played by EXAFS and XANES Techniques in Understanding the Nature of Ti Sites in TS-1 3.2.2. Template Burning in TS-1: XANES, EXAFS, and XES Results Compared with Adsorption of Ligand Molecules 3.2.3. Effect of the Amount of Incorporated Heteroatom 3.2.4. Modeling of [Ti(OSi)4] Perfect Sites in Interaction with Ligands by an Ab Initio Periodic Approach: Comparison with EXAFS Results 3.2.5. Reactivity of Framework Ti Species toward H2O2/H2O 3.3. Fe- and Ga-Silicalite 3.3.1. Role of EXAFS in Understanding the Effect of Template Burning in Ga- and Fe-Substituted Silicalite 3.3.2. Role of EXAFS in the Debate Concerning the Nuclearity of Extraframework Fe Species in Zeolites 3.3.3. Fe-Substituted Silicalite: What Has Been Learnt from XANES 3.3.4. Reactivity of Extraframework Fe Species Hosted in the MFI Channels toward N2O and NO 3.3.5. New Frontiers of XAS/XES Techniques Applied to the Characterization of Fe-Zeolites 3.4. B-CHA 3.4.1. Template Burning in B-SSZ-13 an example of low energy XAFS 3.4.2. Reactivity of B-SSZ-13 toward NH3 3.5. Other Metal Isomorphous Substitutions 4. Cation-Exchanged Zeolites: The Copper Case Study 4.1. Preparation of Cu+-Exchanged Zeolites Exhibiting a Model Compound Character 4.2. Cu+-ZSM-5 4.2.1. XANES Characterization of Intrazeolitic Cuprous Carbonyl Complexes in Cu+-ZSM-5 4.2.2. EXAFS Determination of the Structure of Cu+(CO)n Complexes 4.3. Cu+-MOR 4.3.1. XANES and EXAFS Study of Cu+(CO)n Complexes Hosted in Cu+–MOR: Comparison with Cu+-ZSM-5 4.4. Reactivity toward NO: In Situ Cu+ → Cu2+ Oxidation in Cu+-ZSM-5 and Cu+-MOR 4.4.1. Temperature Dependent NO Reaction in Cu+-ZSM-5 4.4.2. Temperature-Dependent NO Reaction in Cu+-MOR 4.5. Bent mono-(μ-oxo)dicupric and bis(μ-oxo)dicopper Biomimetic Inorganic Models for NO Decomposition and Methane Oxidation in Cu-ZSM-5: Comparison with Fe-ZSM-5 5. Structure and Reactivity of Metallorganic Frameworks Probed by In Situ XAFS and XES 5.1. Adsorption of CO on Cu2+ Sites in Cu3(BTC)2 or HKUST-1 5.2. Adsorption of O2 on Cr2+ Sites in Cr3(BTC)2 5.2.1. XANES Study 5.2.2. XES Study 5.3. Adsorption of NO, CO, and N2 on Ni2+ sites in Ni-CPO-27 6. Cr/SiO2 Phillips Catalyst: In Situ Ethylene Polymerization 6.1. Relevance of the Catalyst and Still Open Questions 6.2. XAFS Applied on the Phillips Catalyst 6.2.1. A 4 wt % Cr/SiO2 Sample: XAFS in Transmission Mode 6.2.2. A 0.5 wt % Cr/SiO2 Sample: XAFS in Fluorescence Mode 6.3. SEXAFS Applied on the Phillips Catalyst: Bridging the Gap between Heterogeneous Catalysis and Surface Science 6.3.1. Brief Overview on SEXAFS Applied to Catalysis 6.3.2. SEXAFS Applied to a Planar Model of the Phillips Catalyst 7. Space-Resolved X-rays Experiments 7.1. Brief Introduction to X-ray Space-Resolved Studies in Catalysis 7.2. Cu/ZnO Case Study 8. Time-Resolved XAFS on Catalyst at Work: OPERANDO Experiments 8.1. Brief Introduction to Time-Resolved Studies in Catalysis 8.2. CuCl2/Al2O3 Case Study 8.2.1. Industrial Relevance of the CuCl2/Al2O3 System 8.2.2. Preliminary in Situ XAFS Experiments 8.2.3. Operando Experiments 9. XAS and XES Studies on Supported Metal Nanoparticles 9.1. XAFS Applied to Supported Metal Nanoparticles: A Brief Overview 9.2. Preparation of Pd-Supported Catalysts Follow

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr2000898

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bordiga, S., Groppo, E., Agostini, G., van Bokhoven, J. A., & Lamberti, C.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2013-02-28
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
1736-1850
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2316136868
Cited by
643
References
10
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.