The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultimate Limits to Intercalation Reactions for Lithium Batteries
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTUltimate Limits to Intercalation Reactions for Lithium BatteriesM. Stanley Whittingham*View Author Information NorthEast Center for Chemical Energy Storage, Binghamton University, 4400 Vestal Parkway East, Binghamton, New York 13902, United States*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 23, 11414–11443Publication Date (Web):October 29, 2014Publication History Received5 June 2014Published online29 October 2014Published inissue 10 December 2014https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr5003003https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5003003review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2014 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views20251Altmetric-Citations925LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Electrochemical cells,Lattices,Lithium,Materials,Transition metals Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries
Liu, J., Bao, Z., Cui, Y., Dufek, E. J., Goodenough, J. B., Khalifah, P., Li, Q., Liaw, B. Y., Liu, P., Manthiram, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x · Cited by 3,412
Self-citationPlacke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S., & Winter, M. (2017) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 · Cited by 1,117
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
All-temperature batteries enabled by fluorinated electrolytes with non-polar solvents
Fan, X., Ji, X., Chen, L., Chen, J., Deng, T., Han, F., Yue, J., Piao, N., Wang, R., Zhou, X., et al. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 · Cited by 938
Predicting the state of charge and health of batteries using data-driven machine learning
Ng, M.-F., Zhao, J., Yan, Q., Conduit, G. J., & Seh, Z. W. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0156-7 · Cited by 793
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittingham, M. S.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-10-29
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 11414-11443
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2331364947
- Cited by
- 1,130
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultimate Limits to Intercalation Reactions for Lithium Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cr5003003
- The paper
- Whittingham, M. S. (2014). Ultimate Limits to Intercalation Reactions for Lithium Batteries. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5003003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
