Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Field Effects in Plasmonic Photocatalyst by Precise SiO2 Thickness Control Using Atomic Layer Deposition

Kumar, Manippady Krishna, Krishnamoorthy, Sivashankar, Tan, Lee Kheng, Chiam, Sing Yang, Tripathy, Sudhiranjan, Gao, Han·2011·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

We report on TiO 2 thin films with superior photocatalytic efficiency due to an increase in its exciton carrier generation induced by the plasmonic field of the underlying silver nanoparticles. TiO 2 thin films are deposited on supported silver nanoparticles and are separated from each other by a fine-tunable thickness of SiO 2 interlayer. The TiO 2 (15 nm)/SiO 2 /Ag nanoparticle architectures with systematic variation of SiO 2 interlayer thickness of 2, 5, 10, and 20 nm show systematic increase in photocatalytic efficiency with decrease in the SiO 2 thickness. The efficiency enhancement is shown to be caused by plasmonically enhanced carrier generation, which was confirmed through photocurrent measurements and Raman spectroscopy. With a 2 nm SiO 2 interlayer that exhibited the best photocatalytic performance, a 3 times increase in photocurrent density, and a 200 times increase in Raman signal intensity of TiO 2 is found. Atomic layer deposition was employed to achieve precise film thickness control of SiO 2 and TiO 2 layers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs100117v

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, M. K., Krishnamoorthy, S., Tan, L. K., Chiam, S. Y., Tripathy, S., & Gao, H.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2011-02-28
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
300-308
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314898559
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.