Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Makes for a Bad Catalytic Cycle? A Theoretical Study on the Suzuki−Miyaura Reaction within the Energetic Span Model

Kozuch, Sebastian, Martin, Jan M. L.·2011·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The Suzuki−Miyaura cross-coupling reaction using PMe 3, PPh 3, and P t Bu 3 as ligands was studied theoretically with accurate density functional theory (DFT) methods and the Energetic Span Model. The energetic span model is a tool to compute catalytic turnover frequencies (TOF) from computationally obtained energy states. In this work the model is expanded to include turnover numbers (TON) and off-cycle intermediates. The results show that although the monophosphine route is the fastest pathway, the diphosphine cis route (accessible for small ligands) may also be reactive. The death sentence of the PMe 3 catalyst is the possibility to reach the low energy trans diphosphine species, which substantially reduces the TON. In the PPh 3 case, the formation of Pd 0 L 3 was found to be the major drawback for efficient catalysis. The P t Bu 3 system is the most efficient of the three, as only the monophosphine mechanism is accessible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs100129u

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2011-02-22
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
246-253
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322365966
Cited by
169
References
1
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.