The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methanol-to-Olefin Conversion on Silicoaluminophosphate Catalysts: Effect of Brønsted Acid Sites and Framework Structures
Abstract
Silicoaluminophosphates (SAPO) with different framework structures and amounts of Brønsted acid sites, that is, SAPO-34, SAPO-41, SAPO-11, and SAPO-46, were synthesized and studied as catalysts for the methanol-to-olefin (MTO) conversion. Besides the well-known SAPO-34 catalyst, also SAPO-41 exhibits a good MTO performance with a methanol conversion of 100% and a selectivity to light olefins of about 70% at the reaction temperature of 723 K, which maintains up to a time-on-stream of 10 h. The Brønsted acid sites of silicoaluminophosphate catalysts employed in this study were characterized by means of 1 H MAS NMR spectroscopy. These studies were performed with unloaded samples for studying the type and number of OH groups and after loading of ammonia for determining the amount of accessible Brønsted acid sites. The occluded organic species formed on the catalysts during the MTO reaction were analyzed by in situ UV/vis spectroscopy, thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). On the basis of the characterization and catalytic results, we discuss the effects of Brønsted acid sites and framework structures on the catalytic performance of silicoaluminophosphates in the MTO conversion. The amount of Brønsted acid sites strongly affects the adsorption of methanol and the formation of hydrocarbon pool compounds as well as the catalyst deactivation. On the other hand, the framework structures of the silicoaluminophosphates under study influence the diffusion of products and thus control the product selectivity of the MTO reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances of pore system construction in zeolite-catalyzed chemical industry processes
Shi, J., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Tang, Y., & Xie, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00626k · Cited by 363
Applications of Zeolites to C1 Chemistry: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities
Zhang, Q., Yu, J., & Corma, A. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202002927 · Cited by 316
Unraveling the Reaction Mechanisms Governing Methanol‐to‐Olefins Catalysis by Theory and Experiment
Hemelsoet, K., Van der Mynsbrugge, J., De Wispelaere, K., Waroquier, M., & Van Speybroeck, V. (2013) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201201023 · Cited by 270
Martínez-Franco, R., Li, Z., Martínez-Triguero, J., Moliner, M., & Corma, A. (2016) · Catalysis Science & Technology · doi:10.1039/c5cy02298c · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, W., Wang, X., Wu, G., Guan, N., Hunger, M., & Li, L.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-02-28
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 292-299
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316210987
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.