Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ceria-Doped Ni/SBA-16 Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane

Zhang, Shenghong, Muratsugu, Satoshi, Ishiguro, Nozomu, Tada, Mizuki·2013·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Ni-ceria nanoparticles (Ni/Ce = 1/1) in the cage-like pores of SBA-16 were prepared and evaluated in methane dry reforming reactions. Coexistence of ceria in NiCe/SBA-16 resulted in forming uniformly sized Ni particles (av. 5.7 nm) within the mesopores of SBA-16, because of the confinement effect from the framework of SBA-16 and the strong interaction between Ni and ceria. Ceria addition facilitated the reduction of NiCe/SBA-16 compared with Ni/SBA-16, and Ce 3+ was the dominant species in both fresh and used NiCe/SBA-16 catalysts, as determined by Ce L III -edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES). The methane conversion was much more stable on NiCe/SBA-16 than on Ni/CeO 2 and Ni/SBA-16 in the methane dry reforming at 973 K during a 100 h reaction period; the deactivation of the Ni catalyst and the collapse of the SBA-16 framework were preferably suppressed for NiCe/SBA-16 under the reaction conditions. The remarkable effect of ceria on the structural stability of both the active Ni particles and the SBA-16 framework led to the consistent catalytic performance of NiCe/SBA-16 in methane dry reforming.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs400159w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S., Muratsugu, S., Ishiguro, N., & Tada, M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2013-07-22
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
1855-1864
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2324355796
Cited by
347
References
1
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.