Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Main-Group Lewis Acids for C–F Bond Activation

Stahl, Timo, Klare, Hendrik F. T., Oestreich, Martin·2013·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The significant benefits of fluorinated compounds have inspired the development of diverse techniques for the activation and subsequent (de)functionalization of rather inert C–F bonds. Although substantial progress has been made in the selective activation of C(sp 2 )–F bonds employing transition metal complexes, protocols that address nonactivated C(sp 3 )–F bonds are much less established. In this regard, the use of strong main-group Lewis acids has emerged as a powerful tool to selectively activate C(sp 3 )–F bonds in saturated fluorocarbons. This Perspective provides a concise overview of various cationic and neutral silicon-, boron-, and aluminum-based Lewis acids that have been identified to facilitate the heterolytic fluoride abstraction from aliphatic fluorides. The potential of these Lewis acids in hydrodefluorination as well as defluorinative C–F bond functionalization reactions is highlighted. Emphasis is placed on the underlying mechanistic principles to provide a systematic classification of the individual reactions. Finally, brief insight into the related C–F bond activation chemistry using carbocations or Brønsted acids is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs4003244

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stahl, T., Klare, H. F. T., & Oestreich, M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2013-06-18
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
1578-1587
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319757463
Cited by
470
References
22
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.