The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rational Design of High-Performance DeNOx Catalysts Based on MnxCo3–xO4 Nanocages Derived from Metal–Organic Frameworks
Abstract
Herein, we have rationally designed and originally developed a high-performance deNO x catalyst based on hollow porous Mn x Co 3– x O 4 nanocages with a spinel structure thermally derived from nanocube-like metal–organic frameworks (Mn 3 [Co(CN) 6 ] 2 · n H 2 O), which are synthesized via a self-assemble method. The as-prepared catalysts have been characterized systematically to elucidate their morphological structure and surface properties. As compared with conventional Mn x Co 3– x O 4 nanoparticles, Mn x Co 3– x O 4 nanocages possess a much better catalytic activity at low-temperature regions, higher N 2 selectivity, more extensive operating-temperature window, higher stability, and SO 2 tolerance. The feature of hollow and porous structures provides a larger surface area and more active sites to adsorb and activate reaction gases, resulting in the high catalytic activity. Moreover, the uniform distribution and strong interaction of manganese and cobalt oxide species not only enhance the catalytic cycle but also inhibit the formation of manganese sulfate, resulting in high catalytic cycle stability and good SO 2 tolerance. In light of the various characterization results, the excellent deNO x performance of Mn x Co 3– x O 4 nanocages can be attributed to the hollow and porous structures, the uniform distribution of active sites, as well as the strong interaction of manganese and cobalt oxide species. The excellent catalytic performance suggests that Mn x Co 3– x O 4 nanocages are promising candidates for low-temperature deNO x catalysts. More importantly, the present study indicates that the hollow porous architectures and well-dispersed active components can effectively enhance the performance of catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yu, X., Yu, L., Wu, H. B., & Lou, X. W. (. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201500267 · Cited by 513
Li, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Rykov, A. I., Ahmed, M. A., & Wang, J. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.050 · Cited by 473
Recent advances in Prussian blue and Prussian blue analogues: synthesis and thermal treatments
Zakaria, M. B., & Chikyow, T. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.014 · Cited by 389
Nanoarchitectonics: A New Materials Horizon for Prussian Blue and Its Analogues
Azhar, A., Li, Y., Cai, Z., Zakaria, M. B., Masud, M. K., Hossain, M. S. A., Kim, J., Zhang, W., Na, J., Yamauchi, Y., et al. (2019) · Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan · doi:10.1246/bcsj.20180368 · Cited by 267
Zhao, M., Deng, J., Liu, J., Li, Y., Liu, J., Duan, Z., Xiong, J., Zhao, Z., Wei, Y., Song, W., et al. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b01995 · Cited by 266
Lu, J., Zhou, W., Wang, L., Jia, J., Ke, Y., Yang, L., Zhou, K., Liu, X., Tang, Z., Li, L., et al. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b02302 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Shi, L., Huang, L., Zhang, J., Gao, R., & Zhang, D.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1753-1763
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316765721
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.